High Court of Gujarat Partly Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim Due to Erroneous Assessment of Permanent Disability. Tribunal's Award Modified Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as Medical Evidence Showed 15% Disability Instead of 5%.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Varsingbhai Tajabhai Bhabhor, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 17.05.2018 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Dahod, in MACP No.2015 of 2004 (Old MAC Petition No.2039 of 1997). The appellant was the original claimant in a motor accident claim petition arising from an accident that occurred on 16.02.1997. On that day, the appellant and his relatives were traveling in a relative's Jeep bearing registration No.GJ-17-C-1008 towards Dahod. When the jeep reached near Machhan bridge at Tandi Village, the driver of an ST Bus bearing registration No.GRR-8181, coming from the opposite side, drove the bus in a rash and negligent manner and dashed it against the jeep. As a result, the appellant sustained serious injuries. The appellant filed a claim petition seeking compensation. The Tribunal, after appreciating the evidence, awarded a total compensation of Rs. 1,50,000/- with interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing till realization. The appellant, feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the award, preferred the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation. The main legal issues considered by the court were whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was just and proper, particularly regarding the assessment of permanent disability and future loss of income. The appellant argued that the Tribunal had erred in assessing permanent disability at 5% and had not granted future loss of income. The respondent, Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (GSRTC), opposed the appeal. The High Court, after hearing the learned advocates for both sides and perusing the original record and proceedings, found that the Tribunal's assessment of permanent disability at 5% was erroneous. The court noted that the medical evidence indicated a permanent disability of 15% and accordingly enhanced the disability percentage. The court also granted future loss of income and increased the compensation for pain, shock, and suffering. The court modified the award, enhancing the total compensation from Rs. 1,50,000/- to Rs. 2,50,000/- with interest at 9% per annum. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Permanent Disability - Section 173 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The appellant sustained serious injuries in a vehicular accident and claimed compensation. The Tribunal awarded Rs. 1,50,000/-. The High Court found the assessment of permanent disability at 5% by the Tribunal to be erroneous and enhanced it to 15% based on medical evidence. The court also granted future loss of income and increased compensation for pain, shock, and suffering. Held that the compensation must be just and fair, and the Tribunal's award was modified accordingly (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was just and proper, particularly regarding the assessment of permanent disability and future loss of income.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The judgment and award dated 17.05.2018 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Dahod, in MACP No.2015 of 2004 is modified. The appellant is entitled to total compensation of Rs. 2,50,000/- with interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing till realization. The respondent no.1 is directed to deposit the enhanced amount within eight weeks.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Compensation Assessment
  • Permanent Disability
  • Future Loss of Income
  • Section 173 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (02) 642

R/First Appeal No. 2805 of 2022

2026-02-09

Hasmukh D. Suthar

Mr. Hemal Shah for the Appellant, Ms. Sejal K. Mandavia for Respondent No.1, Mr. Dakshesh Mehta and Mr. Rushang D. Mehta for Defendant No.5

Varsingbhai Tajabhai Bhabhor

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal awarded Rs. 1,50,000/- with interest at 9% per annum.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal's assessment of permanent disability at 5% was correct? Whether the appellant is entitled to future loss of income? Whether the compensation awarded is just and proper?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Tribunal erred in assessing permanent disability at 5% and did not grant future loss of income. Respondent opposed the appeal, supporting the Tribunal's award.

Ratio Decidendi

The assessment of permanent disability must be based on medical evidence. In this case, the medical evidence showed 15% disability, not 5% as assessed by the Tribunal. Future loss of income must be granted when there is permanent disability affecting earning capacity. Compensation must be just and fair.

Judgment Excerpts

Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and award dated 17.05.2018 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Dahod... It is the case of the appellant – original claimant that on 16.02.1997, the appellant and his relatives were travelling in relative’s Jeep... The learned Tribunal after appreciating the evidence awarded compensation of Rs. 1,50,000/-...

Procedural History

The appellant filed MACP No.2015 of 2004 (Old MAC Petition No.2039 of 1997) before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Dahod. The Tribunal passed an award on 17.05.2018. Aggrieved, the appellant filed the present First Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 173
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award Reinstating Watchman in Forest Department — Termination Without Notice or Enquiry Held Illegal Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Daily-wage employee's removal after completion of work was not automati...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Dismisses State Appeal in Corruption Case — Acquittal Upheld Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention o...