Gujarat High Court Allows ASI's Petition for Higher Pay Scale Due to Uncontroverted Facts and Non-Compliance with Court Order. Petitioner Entitled to 1st Higher Grade Pay Scale of PSI Under Clause-3 of Government Resolution Dated 16.08.1994 as Respondents Failed to Decide Representation or File Reply.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 199
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Kanjibhai Hirji Bodar, filed a writ petition under Articles 14, 16, 21, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the respondents (State of Gujarat and its officers) to grant him the 1st Higher Grade Pay Scale of Police Sub-Inspector (PSI) in the pay scale of Rs.1640-2900 (Revised) as per the Finance Department's Resolution dated 16.08.1994, along with incidental and consequential benefits. The petitioner had completed 9 years of service as an Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) and claimed entitlement under Clause-3 of the said resolution. The court noted that despite an order dated 29.08.2017 directing the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation dated 09.02.2016 and file pleadings, no reply or decision was forthcoming. Consequently, the court assumed the averments in the petition to be uncontroverted. The petitioner's advocate argued that the petitioner fulfilled all criteria under Clause-3. The court, relying on the uncontroverted facts and the respondents' inaction, allowed the petition. It directed the respondents to grant the 1st Higher Grade Pay Scale of PSI to the petitioner within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order, failing which the petitioner would be entitled to interest at 6% per annum on the arrears from the date of filing the petition until actual payment. The court also imposed costs of Rs.5,000 on the respondents for their casual approach.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Higher Pay Scale - Entitlement under Government Resolution - The petitioner, an ASI, claimed 1st Higher Grade Pay Scale of PSI upon completing 9 years in the cadre, as per Clause-3 of the Government Resolution dated 16.08.1994. The respondents failed to file a reply or decide the representation despite court order. The court held that the uncontroverted averments entitled the petitioner to the relief, and directed the respondents to grant the higher pay scale with consequential benefits within eight weeks. (Paras 3-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to the 1st Higher Grade Pay Scale of PSI upon completion of 9 years as ASI under Clause-3 of the Government Resolution dated 16.08.1994, and whether the respondents' failure to decide the representation amounts to denial of benefits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to grant the 1st Higher Grade Pay Scale of PSI in the pay scale of Rs.1640-2900 (Revised) to the petitioner within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order. If not granted within that period, the petitioner shall be entitled to interest at 6% per annum on the arrears from the date of filing the petition until actual payment. The respondents are also directed to pay costs of Rs.5,000 to the petitioner for their casual approach.

Law Points

  • Non-compliance with government resolution
  • uncontroverted averments
  • entitlement to higher pay scale
  • mandamus for service benefits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:14633

R/Special Civil Application No. 8719 of 2016

2026-02-24

Maulik J. Shelat

2026:GUJHC:14633

Mr. VM Dhotre, Mr. Mayur V Dhotare, Ms. Forum Sukhadwala

Kanjibhai Hirji Bodar

State of Gujarat Through The Secretary & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus for grant of higher pay scale.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to grant 1st Higher Grade Pay Scale of PSI with consequential benefits.

Filing Reason

Respondents failed to decide petitioner's representation dated 09.02.2016 and did not grant the higher pay scale despite eligibility.

Previous Decisions

Court had passed an order on 29.08.2017 directing respondents to decide representation and complete pleadings, but no compliance was made.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to the 1st Higher Grade Pay Scale of PSI under Clause-3 of the Government Resolution dated 16.08.1994. Whether the respondents' failure to decide the representation and file a reply amounts to admission of the petitioner's claims.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner completed 9 years as ASI and fulfilled all criteria under Clause-3 of the GR dated 16.08.1994, entitling him to the higher pay scale. Respondents did not file any reply or decide the representation despite court order, leading to uncontroverted averments.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the respondents fail to controvert the averments in a petition despite opportunity and court direction, the court may assume the facts to be admitted and grant relief accordingly. The petitioner, having completed 9 years as ASI, is entitled to the 1st Higher Grade Pay Scale of PSI under Clause-3 of the Government Resolution dated 16.08.1994.

Judgment Excerpts

At the outset, it is required to be observed that despite the following order passed by this Court on 29.08.2017, till date, neither any reply nor representation has been decided by the respondents. In view of the aforesaid, it has been assumed by this Court that the averments made in the petition and the prayers made are neither controverted nor opposed by the respondents in any manner whatsoever. The respondents are directed to pay costs of Rs.5,000/- to the petitioner for their casual approach.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 8719 of 2016 in the High Court of Gujarat. On 29.08.2017, the court issued rule and directed respondents to decide the representation dated 09.02.2016 and complete pleadings. The respondents failed to comply. The matter was heard on 24.02.2026 and judgment was pronounced.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 14, 16, 21, 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Section 3(2) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not jus...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Reinstatement of Employee Whose Caste Claim Was Invalidated. Directs Consideration of Protection Under Office Memorandum Dated 10.8.2010 and Kavita Solunke Case for Continuity of Service.