High Court of Gujarat Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Deceased pedestrian found negligent for walking on middle of road; 50% contributory negligence apportioned under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 74
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Ishwarsinh Makwana, who died in a road accident on 14.01.2014. The claimants alleged that the deceased was walking by the side of the road from Godhra to Shahera when a motorcycle bearing registration No. GJ-17-S-9000, driven rashly and negligently, hit him, causing fatal injuries. The claimants filed MAC Petition No. 207 of 2014 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Panchmahals at Godhra, seeking compensation. The Tribunal partly allowed the claim and awarded Rs. 8,50,000/- with interest. The appellant, National Insurance Co. Ltd., being the insurer of the motorcycle, appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the award on the ground that the Tribunal failed to consider contributory negligence of the deceased. The appellant argued that the deceased was walking on the middle of the road, not on the side, and that the complaint was initially filed against an unknown vehicle, with the motorcycle's number given later, suggesting planting of the vehicle. The respondents (claimants and owner/driver) opposed the appeal. The High Court, after hearing the parties and perusing the record, found that the deceased was walking on the middle of the road, which constituted contributory negligence. The court held that both the deceased and the motorcycle driver were equally negligent, and therefore, the compensation should be reduced by 50%. The court modified the award, reducing the compensation to Rs. 4,25,000/- with proportionate costs and interest. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Compensation - Contributory Negligence - Pedestrian Walking on Middle of Road - Deceased pedestrian was walking on the middle of the road and was hit by a motorcycle - Held that the deceased contributed to the accident by his own negligence, warranting 50% apportionment of liability - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 173 (Paras 5-7).

B) Motor Accident Compensation - Quantum of Compensation - Reduction Due to Contributory Negligence - Tribunal awarded Rs. 8,50,000/- without considering contributory negligence - High Court reduced compensation by 50% after finding deceased equally negligent - Held that compensation must be reduced proportionately (Paras 7-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal erred in not apportioning contributory negligence on the part of the deceased pedestrian who was walking on the middle of the road, and whether the compensation awarded was excessive.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The judgment and award dated 03.02.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Panchmahals at Godhra in MAC Petition No. 207 of 2014 is modified. The claimants are entitled to 50% of the awarded amount i.e., Rs. 4,25,000/- with proportionate costs and interest. The appellant Insurance Company is directed to deposit the modified amount within eight weeks.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Apportionment of liability
  • Pedestrian negligence
  • Motor accident compensation
  • Section 173 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (02) 1120

R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2177 of 2022

2026-02-04

Hasmukh D. Suthar

2026:GUJHC:9043

Mr. V. C. Thomas for appellant, Mr. A. C. Nanavati for respondent nos.1 to 4, Mr. H. K. Choksi for respondent nos.5 and 6

National Insurance Co Ltd

Ramilaben WD/O Ishwarsinh Makwana & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition for compensation arising from a fatal motor accident.

Remedy Sought

The appellant (Insurance Company) sought reduction of compensation awarded by the Tribunal on the ground of contributory negligence of the deceased.

Filing Reason

The appellant was aggrieved by the Tribunal's award of Rs. 8,50,000/- without considering contributory negligence of the deceased pedestrian.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Panchmahals at Godhra, partly allowed MAC Petition No. 207 of 2014 and awarded Rs. 8,50,000/- with interest.

Issues

Whether the deceased pedestrian was guilty of contributory negligence by walking on the middle of the road? Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal should be reduced due to contributory negligence?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant submitted that the deceased was walking on the middle of the road, not on the side, and the complaint was initially against an unknown vehicle, suggesting the motorcycle was planted later. Respondents argued that the deceased was walking on the side of the road and the driver was solely negligent.

Ratio Decidendi

A pedestrian walking on the middle of the road contributes to the accident by his own negligence, and the compensation must be reduced proportionately. In this case, 50% contributory negligence was apportioned to the deceased.

Judgment Excerpts

It is the case of the original claimants – respondent nos.1 to 4 herein, that on 14.01.2014 the deceased Ishwarsinh was going by foot at side of the road from Godhra to Shahera. The learned Advocate for the appellant has submitted that initially the complaint was filed against unknown vehicle and registration number of vehicle was given subsequently. The deceased was walking on the middle of the road and not on the side of the road. Therefore, the deceased himself contributed to the accident.

Procedural History

The original claimants filed MAC Petition No. 207 of 2014 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Panchmahals at Godhra, which was partly allowed on 03.02.2022. The appellant Insurance Company filed First Appeal No. 2177 of 2022 under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, which was heard and decided on 04.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 173
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Granting Retirement Benefits Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Computation of Gratuity and Pension as per Settlement and Rules Upheld.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashed Trial Court’s Order Denying Amendment of Plea in Suit for Pre-emption Rights. Court Held That the Amendment Was Merely Clarificatory and Did Not Change the Nature of the Suit