Gujarat High Court Allows Retired Forest Officer's Petition for Second Higher Pay Scale Under ACP Scheme. Denial of Benefits Quashed, Direction to Reconsider with Arrears and Interest.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 119
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Himmatlal Prabhashankar Trivedi, joined service in 1963 and retired in 2000. He filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of the impugned order/communication dated 12/01/2016 and a direction to grant him benefits of second higher pay scale and pay grade of Forester with deemed date from 11/11/1991, the date his juniors were promoted. The petitioner argued that he was entitled to the second higher pay scale under the Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme. The respondents opposed the petition. The court, after hearing both sides, found that the impugned order was unsustainable and quashed it. The court directed the respondents to reconsider the petitioner's case for grant of second higher pay scale and pay grade of Forester with deemed date from 11/11/1991 and to pay arrears with interest at 6% per annum within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The petition was allowed accordingly.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme - Second Higher Pay Scale - The petitioner, who joined service in 1963 and retired in 2000, sought the second higher pay scale and pay grade of Forester with effect from 11/11/1991, the date his juniors were promoted. The court quashed the impugned order dated 12/01/2016 and directed the respondents to reconsider the petitioner's case for grant of second higher pay scale and pay grade of Forester with deemed date from 11/11/1991, and to pay arrears with interest within 12 weeks. (Paras 1-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, who served from 1963 to 2000, is entitled to the second higher pay scale and pay grade of Forester under the ACP Scheme, and whether the impugned order dated 12/01/2016 denying such benefits is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned order/communication dated 12/01/2016 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioner's case for grant of second higher pay scale and pay grade of Forester with deemed date from 11/11/1991 and to pay arrears with interest at 6% per annum within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of the order.

Law Points

  • Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme
  • Second Higher Pay Scale
  • Forester Pay Grade
  • Denial of Benefits
  • Quashing of Order
  • Direction to Reconsider
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (02) 946

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3842 of 2016

2026-02-19

MAULIK J.SHELAT

2026:GUJHC:14014

V M TRIVEDI, FORUM SUKHADWALA

Himmatlal Prabhashankar Trivedi

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of order denying second higher pay scale and direction to grant benefits.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of impugned order dated 12/01/2016 and direction to grant second higher pay scale and pay grade of Forester with deemed date from 11/11/1991, along with arrears and interest.

Filing Reason

Denial of second higher pay scale and pay grade of Forester under the ACP Scheme despite juniors being promoted on 11/11/1991.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to the second higher pay scale and pay grade of Forester under the ACP Scheme with effect from 11/11/1991.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he joined service in 1963 and retired in 2000, and his juniors were promoted to Forester on 11/11/1991, entitling him to the second higher pay scale from that date. Respondents opposed the petition, but the court found the impugned order unsustainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The impugned order denying the second higher pay scale was unsustainable; the petitioner is entitled to reconsideration of his claim for ACP benefits with effect from the date his juniors were promoted.

Judgment Excerpts

The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking following reliefs: The impugned order / communication dated 12/1/2016 (Annexure-I) is quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 3842 of 2016 before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 12/01/2016. The court heard both sides and delivered judgment on 19/02/2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Service Dispute — Upholds Appointment of Assistant Public Prosecutor. The Court held that the selection committee's decision was not vitiated by bias or procedural irregularity, and the Tribunal's ord...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Returned Candidate in Election Petition Alleging Corrupt Practices by a Chief Minister — Amelioration of Public Grievances Not Corrupt Practice Without Evidence of Abuse of Power. Order 41 Rule 22 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1...