Gujarat High Court Directs Payment of Interest on Delayed Salary to Teacher for Unjustified Delay in Implementing Tribunal Order. The court held that delayed payment of salary without interest amounts to unjust enrichment and ordered interest at 9% per annum.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 28
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Alkaben Ratilal Patel, a teacher, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking interest on delayed payment of salary. The Gujarat Secondary Education Tribunal had directed the respondents (State of Gujarat and others) to pay regular salary from the date of appointment, but the respondents delayed implementation. Despite earlier court orders in Special Civil Application No. 24223 of 2005 and Special Civil Application No. 7695 of 2016, the respondents did not act promptly. The salary was eventually paid on 06-03-2018, but without interest. The petitioner claimed interest at 9% per annum on Rs. 17,86,195/- from the date of appointment to the date of payment. The court found the delay unjustified and held that the petitioner is entitled to interest to compensate for the financial loss. The court directed the respondents to pay interest at 9% per annum within eight weeks, failing which the interest rate would increase to 12% per annum.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Interest on Delayed Payment of Salary - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The petitioner, a teacher, was entitled to regular salary from the date of appointment as per the Tribunal's order, but the respondents delayed payment for several years. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to interest at 9% per annum on the delayed salary amount of Rs. 17,86,195/- from the date of appointment until the date of payment, as the delay was unjustified and caused financial hardship. (Paras 1-11)

B) Service Law - Delay in Implementation of Tribunal Order - Compensation - Gujarat Secondary Education Tribunal - The respondents failed to implement the Tribunal's order dated 31st August 2009 and subsequent court directions, leading to delayed payment of salary. The court held that such delay amounts to unjust enrichment and the petitioner must be compensated with interest. (Paras 4-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on the delayed payment of salary from the date of appointment until the date of actual payment, due to the respondents' failure to implement the Tribunal's order in a timely manner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and directed respondents to pay interest at 9% per annum on Rs. 17,86,195/- from the date of appointment until 06-03-2018 within eight weeks. If not paid within that time, interest at 12% per annum will apply from the date of the judgment until actual payment.

Law Points

  • Interest on delayed payment of salary
  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Gujarat Secondary Education Tribunal
  • Mandamus
  • Unjust enrichment
  • Compensation for delay
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (02) 917

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10557 of 2018

2026-02-09

MAULIK J. SHELAT

2026:GUJHC:10297

MS MAMTA R VYAS, MS NIDHI VYAS

Alkaben Ratilal Patel

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking interest on delayed payment of salary.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to pay interest at 9% per annum on delayed salary of Rs. 17,86,195/- from date of appointment to date of payment.

Filing Reason

Respondents delayed implementation of Tribunal order directing regular salary payment, causing financial hardship.

Previous Decisions

Gujarat Secondary Education Tribunal order dated 31-08-2009 in Application No. 129 of 2006; High Court order in Special Civil Application No. 24223 of 2005 dated 04-05-2009; High Court order in Special Civil Application No. 7695 of 2016 dated 05-05-2016.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on delayed payment of salary due to respondents' failure to implement Tribunal order in time.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that despite Tribunal order and court directions, respondents delayed salary payment until 06-03-2018, causing financial loss. Respondents contended that the delay was not intentional and interest should not be awarded.

Ratio Decidendi

When a statutory authority delays payment of salary without justification, the employee is entitled to interest on the delayed amount to compensate for the loss of use of money and to prevent unjust enrichment.

Judgment Excerpts

The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs: ... Despite an order/direction issued by Gujarat Secondary Education Tribunal ... the claim of the petitioner was not decided by the respondent for long period of time. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to interest on the delayed payment of salary.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Application No. 129 of 2006 before the Gujarat Secondary Education Tribunal, which ordered regular salary on 31-08-2009. The petitioner then filed Special Civil Application No. 24223 of 2005 and allied matters, decided on 04-05-2009. Subsequently, Special Civil Application No. 7695 of 2016 was filed, with an order on 05-05-2016 directing implementation. Salary was paid on 06-03-2018. The present petition was filed on 30-03-2018 seeking interest.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Directs Payment of Interest on Delayed Salary to Teacher for Unjustified Delay in Implementing Tribunal Order. The court held that delayed payment of salary without interest amounts to unjust enrichment and ordered interest at 9% p...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Deletion of NRI Quota in PG Medical Admissions in Rajasthan. Change in Seat Matrix by State Counselling Board Held Valid as Colleges Failed to Provide NRI Seat Details and No Candidate Had Vested Right to Specific Quota.