Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition of Daily Wagers Seeking Absorption as Permanent Employees in Gujarat Maritime Board. Daily wage employees not entitled to regularization or higher grade pay-scale in absence of sanctioned posts and recruitment rules.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 60
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, daily wage employees of the Gujarat Maritime Board, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the Board's decision not to absorb them into the permanent establishment was illegal and arbitrary. They also sought a direction to absorb them as permanent employees on the post of Additional Assistant Engineer (Civil) and to grant them higher grade pay-scale. The petitioners had been working as daily wagers for several years and claimed that they were entitled to regularization and higher pay-scale based on their length of service. The respondents opposed the petition, arguing that the petitioners were not appointed against sanctioned posts and that their absorption would violate recruitment rules. The court, after hearing the parties, held that daily wagers have no fundamental right to regularization and that absorption can only be made against sanctioned posts in accordance with recruitment rules. The court also held that higher grade pay-scale is admissible only to regular employees and not to daily wagers. Since the petitioners failed to establish any legal right, the court dismissed the petition, holding that no writ of mandamus could be issued.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Regularization of Daily Wagers - Absorption into Permanent Establishment - Daily wagers working with Gujarat Maritime Board sought absorption as Additional Assistant Engineer (Civil) and higher grade pay-scale - Court held that daily wagers have no fundamental right to regularization, and absorption can only be made against sanctioned posts in accordance with recruitment rules - Petition dismissed as petitioners failed to establish any legal right or that they were appointed against sanctioned posts (Paras 1-22).

B) Service Law - Higher Grade Pay-Scale - Daily Wagers - Petitioners claimed higher grade pay-scale on completion of certain years of service - Court held that higher grade pay-scale is admissible only to regular employees and not to daily wagers - No direction can be issued to grant higher grade pay-scale to daily wagers (Paras 1-22).

C) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Conditions for Issuance - Petitioners sought mandamus to direct absorption and grant of higher grade pay-scale - Court held that a writ of mandamus can be issued only when the petitioner has a legal right and the respondent has a corresponding legal duty - In absence of any legal right, no mandamus can be issued (Paras 1-22).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether daily wage employees of Gujarat Maritime Board are entitled to absorption as permanent employees and grant of higher grade pay-scale.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Daily wagers have no fundamental right to regularization
  • absorption into permanent establishment requires sanctioned posts and compliance with recruitment rules
  • higher grade pay-scale not admissible without regular appointment
  • writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct absorption in absence of legal right.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (02) 114

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 21409 of 2016

2026-02-23

MAULIK J.SHELAT

MR DIPAK R DAVE, MS. NIDHI VYAS, MS DHARMISHTA RAVAL

Manojkumar Kanubhai Patel (Deceased) & Ors.

Gujarat Maritime Board & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking absorption as permanent employees and grant of higher grade pay-scale.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to quash the decision of the respondent-Board not to absorb them, and to direct absorption as permanent employees on the post of Additional Assistant Engineer (Civil) and grant higher grade pay-scale.

Filing Reason

The petitioners, daily wage employees, were not absorbed into the permanent establishment of the Gujarat Maritime Board and were not granted higher grade pay-scale.

Issues

Whether daily wage employees are entitled to absorption as permanent employees? Whether daily wage employees are entitled to higher grade pay-scale?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they have worked for many years and are entitled to regularization and higher grade pay-scale. Respondents argued that petitioners were not appointed against sanctioned posts and absorption would violate recruitment rules.

Ratio Decidendi

Daily wagers have no fundamental right to regularization or absorption into permanent establishment. Absorption can only be made against sanctioned posts in accordance with recruitment rules. Higher grade pay-scale is admissible only to regular employees. A writ of mandamus can be issued only when the petitioner has a legal right and the respondent has a corresponding legal duty.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard Mr. Dipak R. Dave, learned advocate for the petitioners, Ms. Dharmishta Raval, learned advocate for the respondent No.1 – Board and Ms. Nidhi Vyas, learned AGP for the respondent - State, at length. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking following reliefs:

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Denial of Legal Heirship Certificate to Second Wife in Pension Dispute Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Court Interprets Rule 116(6)(a)(i) in Consonance with Hindu Personal Law, Refusing to Recognize V...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Madras Closes Writ Appeal as Infructuous After Withdrawal of Original Writ Petition. Appeal against order in writ petition was closed after respondent withdrew original writ petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn.