Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual GST Return. Late fee under Section 47(2) of CGST Act is leviable for failure to file return, and penalty under Section 125 is valid as no separate penalty prescribed.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 220
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Tvl.KPK Fuel Services, a proprietorship firm, challenged an order dated 13.12.2023 issued under Section 73 of the TNGST Act, 2017, which imposed a late fee and penalty for failure to file the annual return in Form GSTR-9 for the financial year 2017-18. The petitioner contended that the time limit for filing the annual return was three years from the due date, and that the due date was extended to 05.02.2026 by notification, so the three-year period lapsed in February 2023. The petitioner also argued that the impugned order erroneously recorded that the return was filed on 07.12.2022, and that late fee could only be levied for belated filing, not for non-filing. Additionally, the petitioner submitted that penalty under Section 125 of the GST enactments could not be imposed after levying a late fee. The respondent, the State Tax Officer, was represented by Government Counsel. The court examined Section 47(2) of the CGST Act, which imposes a late fee of Rs.100 per day for failure to furnish the return by the due date, subject to a maximum of 0.25% of turnover. The court found that the provision clearly applies to failure to file the return, and thus the late fee was valid. Regarding the penalty, the court noted that Section 125 allows penalty up to Rs.25,000 for contravention of any provision if no separate penalty is prescribed, and since no separate penalty is prescribed for failure to file the annual return, the penalty was also valid. The court dismissed the writ petition, holding that there was no infirmity in the impugned order warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

Headnote

A) Goods and Services Tax - Levy of Late Fee - Section 47(2) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Late fee is leviable on a registered person who fails to furnish the return required under Section 44 by the due date, at Rs.100 per day subject to maximum of 0.25% of turnover - The court held that the provision clearly applies to failure to file return, and the impugned order imposing late fee was valid (Paras 4-7).

B) Goods and Services Tax - Penalty - Section 125 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Penalty of up to Rs.25,000 can be imposed for contravention of any provision if no separate penalty is prescribed - Since no separate penalty is prescribed for failure to file annual return, imposition of penalty under Section 125 is in order - The court held that the petitioner's contention that penalty cannot be imposed after levying late fee was untenable (Paras 6-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the imposition of late fee and penalty under GST for failure to file annual return is valid

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Law Points

  • Late fee leviable for failure to file return
  • Penalty under Section 125 valid if no separate penalty prescribed
  • Section 47(2) CGST Act applies to non-filing of annual return
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (06) 169

WP No. 17421 of 2026

2026-06-02

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

2026:MHC:2026

Mr.Raghunandan Sriram, Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran

Tvl.KPK Fuel Services

State Tax officer, Hosur North 2 Assessment Circle

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order imposing late fee and penalty for failure to file annual GST return.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought issuance of a writ of Certiorari to quash the respondent's order in GST DRC 07 dated 13.12.2023.

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the imposition of late fee and penalty for non-filing of annual return for FY 2017-18.

Issues

Whether late fee under Section 47(2) of CGST Act can be levied for failure to file annual return? Whether penalty under Section 125 of CGST Act can be imposed after levying late fee?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that late fee can be levied only for belated filing, not for non-filing, and that the time limit for filing had expired. Petitioner argued that penalty under Section 125 cannot be imposed after levying late fee. Respondent supported the impugned order.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 47(2) of CGST Act imposes late fee for failure to furnish return by due date, and Section 125 allows penalty for contravention if no separate penalty prescribed; both are validly imposed.

Judgment Excerpts

From the text of Sub-Section (2), it is evident that late fees is leviable on a registered person who fails to file the return by the due date. On perusal of applicable statutes, no separate penalty is prescribed in respect of failure to file the annual return. Hence, the imposition of penalty is in order.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 13.12.2023 issued under Section 73 of TNGST Act. The court heard arguments and dismissed the petition on 02-06-2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017: Section 44, Section 47(2), Section 125
  • Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017: Section 73
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in NDPS Case: Recovery from Vehicle Search Not Vitiated by Non-Compliance of Section 50 for Personal Search. The Court held that Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies only to personal search, and recovery of contraband ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Grievous Injuries in Motor Accident Claim — Applies Multiplier Method for Loss of Future Income and Increases Awards for Pain and Suffering, Special Diet, Attendant Charges, Transportation, and Loss o...