Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition as Not Pressed in Rural Development Matter — Petitioner's Counsel Endorses Withdrawal. Contempt Petition Under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Dismissed as Not Pressed Due to Counsel's Endorsement.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 128
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, T. Praveen Kumar, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging deliberate and wilful disobedience of a common order dated 27.01.2026 passed by the Madras High Court in W.P.(MD)No.456 of 2026. The respondents/contemnors were Gagandeep Singh Bedi, P. Ponniah, Ranjeet Singh, and T. Panchapakesan, all officers of the Tamil Nadu government. When the petition was taken up for hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. M. Mohamed Zamil, did not press the petition and made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the endorsement, the court dismissed the contempt petition as not pressed. The order was passed by Justice B. Pugalendhi on 05.06.2026.

Headnote

A) Contempt of Court - Dismissal as Not Pressed - Section 11, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Petitioner's counsel did not press the contempt petition and made an endorsement to that effect - Court dismissed the petition as not pressed in view of the endorsement - Held that when counsel does not press the petition, it is liable to be dismissed (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the contempt petition should be proceeded with or dismissed as not pressed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Contempt Petition dismissed as not pressed.

Law Points

  • Contempt of Courts Act
  • 1971
  • Section 11
  • Dismissal as not pressed
  • Endorsement by counsel
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (06) 55

Cont.P.(MD)S.R.No.19096 of 2026

2026-06-05

B. Pugalendhi

Mr. M. Mohamed Zamil for M/s. Ajmal Associates

T. Praveen Kumar

Gagandeep Singh Bedi, I.A.S., State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009; P. Ponniah, I.A.S., Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Chennai - 15; Ranjeet Singh, I.A.S., District Collector, Theni District, Theni; T. Panchapakesan, P.A. to District Collector (Development), Office of the Collectorate, Theni District, Theni

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of court order.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to punish contemnors for disobedience of order dated 27.01.2026 in W.P.(MD)No.456 of 2026.

Filing Reason

Alleged deliberate and wilful disobedience of common order dated 27.01.2026.

Previous Decisions

Common order dated 27.01.2026 passed in W.P.(MD)No.456 of 2026.

Issues

Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed as not pressed.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel did not press the petition and made an endorsement.

Ratio Decidendi

When counsel does not press a contempt petition and makes an endorsement to that effect, the petition is liable to be dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Excerpts

When this Contempt Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner did not press this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for this petitioner, this Contempt Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed contempt petition on alleged disobedience of order dated 27.01.2026 in W.P.(MD)No.456 of 2026. At hearing, counsel did not press petition and made endorsement. Court dismissed petition as not pressed on 05.06.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition as Not Pressed in Rural Development Matter — Petitioner's Counsel Endorses Withdrawal. Contempt Petition Under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Dismissed as Not Pressed Due to Counsel's Endors...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Goa University's Challenge to Town Planning Board Directions and Allows Dr. Shetye's Complaint Regarding Illegal Compound Wall. The Court held that the University's construction of a compound wall without leaving ac...