High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Intent. Wall Collapse Incident Leads to Death and Injuries; Court Holds Offences May Fall Under Section 304A IPC, Not Section 304 IPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 222
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, accused Nos.2 and 3, filed separate criminal petitions under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in connection with Crime No.46/2019 registered at Dharwad Sub-Urban Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), 338 (causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others), and 337 (causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The case arose from an incident where a wall collapsed, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to others. The petitioners were the owners of the property where the wall was constructed. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners had constructed the wall without proper foundation and using substandard materials, leading to its collapse. The petitioners argued that there was no prima facie case against them for the offence under Section 304 IPC as there was no intention or knowledge to cause death. They contended that the case, if any, would fall under Section 304A IPC (causing death by negligence), which is bailable. The State opposed the bail applications, submitting that the petitioners had acted with gross negligence and that the wall collapse was due to their reckless conduct. The court, after hearing both sides, observed that the material on record did not indicate any intention on the part of the petitioners to cause death or knowledge that their act would cause death. The court noted that the case may fall under Section 304A IPC, which is a bailable offence. Accordingly, the court allowed both petitions and granted bail to the petitioners subject to certain conditions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - Prima Facie Case - Petitioners/accused Nos.2 and 3 sought bail for offences under Sections 304, 338, 337 IPC - Court held that there was no prima facie material to show that the petitioners had any intention to cause death or knowledge that their act would cause death - Held that the petitioners are entitled to bail as the case does not fall under Section 304 IPC but may be under Section 304A IPC (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners/accused Nos.2 and 3 are entitled to be enlarged on bail in connection with Crime No.46/2019 for offences punishable under Sections 304, 338 and 337 of IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both criminal petitions are allowed. The petitioners/accused Nos.2 and 3 shall be enlarged on bail in connection with Crime No.46/2019 of Dharwad Sub-Urban Police Station, subject to certain conditions.

Law Points

  • Bail under Section 439 CrPC
  • Prima facie case
  • Culpable homicide not amounting to murder
  • Section 304 IPC
  • Section 338 IPC
  • Section 337 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (06) 5

Criminal Petition No.100869/2019 and Criminal Petition No.100870/2019

2019-06-04

B.A. Patil

Sri. M.T.Nanaiah, Senior Counsel for Sri. Jagadish Patil, Advocate (for petitioners); Sri. V.M.Banakar, Addl. SPP (for respondent)

Sri. Gangappa S/o. Shivappa Shintri (Accused No.3) and Sri. Basavaraj S/o. Demappa Nigadi (Accused No.2)

The State of Karnataka (Dharwad Sub-Urban Police Station)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail application under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Enlargement on bail for accused Nos.2 and 3 in Crime No.46/2019

Filing Reason

Petitioners were arrested in connection with a wall collapse incident resulting in death and injuries

Issues

Whether the petitioners have made out a case for grant of bail under Section 439 CrPC Whether the offences alleged under Section 304 IPC are made out prima facie

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that there is no prima facie case for Section 304 IPC as there is no intention or knowledge to cause death; the case may fall under Section 304A IPC which is bailable. State opposed bail, submitting that the petitioners acted with gross negligence and the wall collapse was due to their reckless conduct.

Ratio Decidendi

For grant of bail under Section 439 CrPC, the court must consider whether there is a prima facie case against the accused. In the absence of material showing intention or knowledge to cause death, the offence under Section 304 IPC is not made out, and the case may fall under Section 304A IPC, which is bailable. Hence, the accused are entitled to bail.

Judgment Excerpts

There is no prima facie material to show that the petitioners had any intention to cause death or knowledge that their act would cause death. The case may fall under Section 304A IPC and not under Section 304 IPC.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed separate bail applications under Section 439 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, which were heard and reserved on 28.05.2019 and pronounced on 04.06.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 304, 338, 337, 304A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – Section 138 – Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Section 14, Section 17 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 482 – Moratorium under IBC bars proceedings against a corporate debtor but not agains...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Intent. Wall Collapse Incident Leads to Death and Injuries; Court Holds Offences May Fall Under Section 304A IPC, Not Section 304 IPC.