High Court of Karnataka Quashes Minimum Wage Notifications for Textile Workers — Procedural Violations Identified.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from four writ petitions filed by the Garment and Textile Workers Union challenging the validity of notifications issued by the Government of Karnataka revising minimum wages for various textile industries. The petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to quash the notifications dated 17.01.2023, which the Union claimed were insufficient and did not follow the required legal procedures. The petitioner argued that the notifications were lower than previously established minimum wages and that the Government had not adhered to the procedural requirements mandated by the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The respondents, representing the State, contended that the notifications were issued following consultations with stakeholders and that the Government had the authority to revise wages. The Court analyzed the procedural history, noting that previous notifications had been quashed and that the Government was required to follow specific procedures for wage revision. The Court found that the notifications dated 17.01.2023 were issued without proper publication of proposals in the Official Gazette, violating Section 5(1)(b) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Consequently, the Court quashed the notifications and directed the Government to undertake a fresh exercise for wage revision in compliance with the law. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to legislative mandates in wage determination processes.

Headnote

A) Labour Law - Minimum Wages - Procedural Compliance - Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Section 5 - The Court quashed the notifications dated 17.01.2023 for failing to comply with the mandatory procedures under Section 5(1)(b) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, as the proposal for wage revision was not published in the Official Gazette. The Government's failure to follow the prescribed procedure invalidated the notifications (Paras 34-46).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notifications issued for minimum wages were valid under the relevant statutory provisions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court quashed the notifications dated 17.01.2023 for failing to comply with the mandatory procedures under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, and directed the Government to undertake a fresh exercise for wage revision in compliance with the law.

Law Points

  • Minimum wages
  • procedural compliance
  • Article 226
  • Trade Union rights
  • legislative mandate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (KAR) (06) 6

WP No. 18020 of 2023 C/W WP No. 14466 of 2023 WP No. 17959 of 2023

2026-06-03

Anant Ramanath Hegde

Sri Clifton D'Rozario, Sri M Rajakumar, Sri S S Naganand, Sri Praveenkumar Hiremath

Garment and Textile Workers Union

Government of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the validity of minimum wage notifications.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notifications and fixation of minimum wages.

Filing Reason

Notifications were claimed to be insufficient and not compliant with legal procedures.

Previous Decisions

Previous notifications had been quashed and the Government was directed to follow specific procedures.

Issues

Validity of minimum wage notifications Compliance with procedural requirements

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that notifications were lower than previous wages and not compliant with the law. Respondent claimed that notifications were issued after due consultation and followed legal procedures.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural mandates in wage determination processes under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.

Judgment Excerpts

The Court quashed the notifications dated 17.01.2023 for failing to comply with the mandatory procedures under Section 5(1)(b) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The Government's failure to follow the prescribed procedure invalidated the notifications.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed challenging the notifications issued under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The Court reserved orders on 17th April 2026 and pronounced the judgment on 3rd June 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Minimum Wages Act, 1948: Section 5
  • General Clauses Act, 1897: Section 6
  • Code on Wages, 2019:
  • Indian Trade Union Act, 1926:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A MV Act — No Negligence Required for Compensation Under No-Fault Liability Scheme. The Court held that the accident arose out of the use of a motor ve...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Telephone Department in Pension Case; Holds Rule 48-A of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Not Applicable Retrospectively. Tribunal's Direction to Treat Employee as Retired on June 1, 1972 Conflicted with Ear...