Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in IPC Section 302 Case — Dying Declaration Found Credible.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeals were filed by two appellants challenging their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Anita Gajanan Wankhede. The incident occurred on June 26, 2017, when the deceased was set ablaze after being doused with kerosene by the appellants following a quarrel. The prosecution's case was based on the dying declarations made by the deceased to several witnesses, including her mother and neighbors, as well as a written declaration recorded by a Special Executive Magistrate. The appellants contended that the prosecution failed to establish a direct link between their actions and the death of the deceased, arguing inconsistencies in medical records and the credibility of the dying declaration. The court analyzed the evidence, emphasizing the consistency of witness testimonies and the circumstances under which the dying declaration was made. It concluded that the dying declaration was credible and sufficient to uphold the conviction, rejecting the appellants' arguments regarding the lack of motive and the condition of the deceased at the time of her statement. The court ultimately upheld the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment for both appellants.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dying Declaration - Credibility of Dying Declaration - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 - The court found the dying declaration credible as it was made in a fit state of mind and corroborated by multiple witnesses, thus supporting the conviction under Section 302 IPC. Held that the dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction if found to be true and voluntary (Paras 23-31).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declaration of the deceased was credible and sufficient to uphold the conviction of the appellants.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court upheld the conviction of both appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, affirming the life sentence and fine imposed by the trial court.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
  • evidentiary value
  • common intention
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (06) 25

Criminal Appeal No. 108 of 2020

2026-06-08

Shreeram V. Shirsat, Manish Pitale

Tapan Thatte, Shivraj Kunche, Akshay Dingale, Amit Mane, Sharmila Kaushik

Manoj Ramaji Chavre, Baburao Nimbaji Yesankar

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to overturn their conviction and sentence.

Filing Reason

Challenging the judgment and order of conviction and sentence.

Previous Decisions

Conviction under Section 302 IPC upheld by the trial court.

Issues

Credibility of the dying declaration Establishment of motive and intent

Submissions/Arguments

Prosecution failed to establish a causal link between the accused's actions and the death. Inconsistencies in medical records and the condition of the deceased at the time of the dying declaration.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized that a credible dying declaration can serve as the sole basis for conviction if it is found to be true and voluntary, irrespective of the presence of corroborative evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellants have been convicted under section 235(2) of Cr.P.C. for the offences punishable under section 302 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The dying declaration inspires confidence and has been made voluntarily. The court found the dying declaration credible as it was made in a fit state of mind and corroborated by multiple witnesses.

Procedural History

The appellants were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, Vasai in Sessions Case No. 98/2017 on 16.07.2019, leading to the present appeals filed in 2020 and 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 313, 164
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A MV Act — No Negligence Required for Compensation Under No-Fault Liability Scheme. The Court held that the accident arose out of the use of a motor ve...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Telephone Department in Pension Case; Holds Rule 48-A of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Not Applicable Retrospectively. Tribunal's Direction to Treat Employee as Retired on June 1, 1972 Conflicted with Ear...