High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Public Servants in BMTF Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Acts Alleged Were in Discharge of Official Duty, Making Sanction Mandatory.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves two criminal petitions filed by accused Nos. 1 and 2, Sri. Jagadish Shivappa Shettar and Sri. S. Sundaresh, challenging FIR No.63/2014 registered by the Bengaluru Metropolitan Task Force (BMTF) Police Station. The petitioners were public servants and the alleged acts were performed in the discharge of their official duties. The court heard arguments from Shri C.V. Nagesh, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioners, and Ms. Namitha Mahesh, learned HCGP for the respondent-State. The core legal issue was whether the prosecution could proceed without the mandatory sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The court held that the acts complained of were directly related to the official duties of the petitioners, and therefore, prior sanction was required. Since no such sanction was obtained, the FIR and complaint were quashed to prevent abuse of process. The court allowed both petitions and disposed of them accordingly.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Sanction for Prosecution - Section 197 CrPC - Public Servants - The court considered whether the FIR and complaint against the petitioners, who were public servants, could be quashed for want of sanction under Section 197 CrPC. The court held that the acts alleged were in discharge of official duty and thus sanction was mandatory. In the absence of sanction, the proceedings were quashed. (Paras 1-5)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Abuse of Process - The court, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, quashed the FIR and complaint as the prosecution without sanction was an abuse of process of law. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and complaint against the petitioners, who are public servants, can be quashed for want of sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both criminal petitions are allowed. FIR No.63/2014 registered by BMTF Police Station and the complaint dated 31.7.2014 filed by respondent No.1 are quashed.

Law Points

  • Sanction under Section 197 CrPC is mandatory for prosecution of public servants for acts done in discharge of official duty
  • FIR quashed for lack of sanction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (02) 4

Criminal Petition No.6731 of 2014 c/w Criminal Petition No.5688 of 2014

2019-02-19

P.S. Dinesh Kumar

C.V. Nagesh, Mrinal Shankar, M.R. Vijayakumar, B.G. Namitha Mahesh

Sri. Jagadish Shivappa Shettar and Sri. S. Sundaresh

Sri. A. Prasad and State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petitions under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR and complaint

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.63/2014 and complaint filed by respondent No.1

Filing Reason

The petitioners, being public servants, were prosecuted without mandatory sanction under Section 197 CrPC for acts done in discharge of official duty

Issues

Whether the FIR and complaint against the petitioners can be quashed for want of sanction under Section 197 CrPC?

Submissions/Arguments

Learned Senior Advocate for petitioners argued that the acts alleged were in discharge of official duty and sanction under Section 197 CrPC was mandatory Learned HCGP for respondent-State opposed the petitions

Ratio Decidendi

Prosecution of a public servant for acts done in discharge of official duty requires prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC; in the absence of such sanction, the proceedings are liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC as an abuse of process of law.

Judgment Excerpts

These two Criminal Petitions are filed by accused Nos.1 and 2 challenging FIR No.63/2014 registered by Bengaluru Metropolitan Task Force ('BMTF' for short) Police Station. Heard Shri C.V.Nagesh, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioners in both the petitions and Ms.Namitha Mahesh, learned HCGP for the respondent-State.

Procedural History

FIR No.63/2014 was registered by BMTF Police on 31.7.2014. Petitioners filed Criminal Petition No.6731/2014 and Criminal Petition No.5688/2014 under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the FIR and complaint. The petitions were heard together and disposed of by common order on 19.2.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 197, 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Public Servants in BMTF Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Acts Alleged Were in Discharge of Official Duty, Making Sanction Mandatory.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award of damages for short supply of coal, finding no patent illegality or confli...