Supreme Court Allows Wife's Appeal in Divorce Case, Restores Family Court's Dismissal of Husband's Petition. Cruelty Allegations Based on Wife's Professional Success and Refusal to Leave Job Do Not Constitute Legal Cruelty Under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

In Favour of Accused
  • 172
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the wife against the High Court's judgment allowing the husband's divorce petition. The marriage was solemnized on 05.12.2007 as per Hindu rites. The wife was a Gynaecologist in a government hospital, and the husband was a businessman. No child was born. The husband filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, alleging cruelty and desertion. The Family Court dismissed the petition, but the High Court reversed it. The Supreme Court held that the allegations of cruelty based on the wife's professional success, refusal to leave her job, and filing of complaints did not constitute legal cruelty. The husband failed to prove desertion as he could not establish animus deserendi or that the wife left without reasonable cause. The Court restored the Family Court's order, allowing the appeal.

Headnote

A) Hindu Marriage Act - Cruelty - Section 13(1)(ia) - Allegations of cruelty based on wife's professional success, refusal to leave job, and filing of complaints - Held that such conduct does not amount to legal cruelty as it does not cause reasonable apprehension of harm or injury to the husband's life or health (Paras 10-15).

B) Hindu Marriage Act - Desertion - Section 13(1)(ib) - Essential ingredients of desertion - animus deserendi and factum of separation - Held that the husband failed to prove that the wife left without reasonable cause or that he did not consent to the separation (Paras 16-20).

C) Evidence Act - Burden of Proof - Matrimonial disputes - The burden lies on the petitioner to prove grounds for divorce - Held that the husband's evidence was insufficient to establish cruelty or desertion (Paras 21-25).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the Family Court's dismissal of the divorce petition on grounds of cruelty and desertion under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and restored the Family Court's order dismissing the husband's divorce petition.

Law Points

  • Cruelty under Hindu Marriage Act
  • Desertion
  • Burden of proof in matrimonial disputes
  • Appreciation of evidence in divorce cases
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (SC) (01) 159

Civil Appeal No. of 2026 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 10422 of 2025)

2026-01-01

Augustine George Masih

2026 INSC 620

Sonal Talpada

Veerbhan Singh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against High Court judgment allowing husband's divorce petition on grounds of cruelty and desertion.

Remedy Sought

Appellant-wife sought restoration of Family Court's order dismissing husband's divorce petition.

Filing Reason

Husband filed divorce petition alleging cruelty and desertion by wife.

Previous Decisions

Family Court at Bharatpur dismissed husband's divorce petition on 21.08.2019; High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur allowed husband's appeal on 02.01.2025.

Issues

Whether the High Court erred in reversing the Family Court's finding that the husband failed to prove cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Whether the High Court erred in reversing the Family Court's finding that the husband failed to prove desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant-wife argued that her professional success and refusal to leave her job did not constitute cruelty, and that the husband consented to her working. Respondent-husband argued that the wife's behavior, including filing complaints against him, amounted to cruelty and that she deserted him without reasonable cause.

Ratio Decidendi

Allegations of cruelty based on wife's professional success, refusal to leave job, and filing of complaints do not constitute legal cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, as they do not cause reasonable apprehension of harm. Desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) requires proof of animus deserendi and factum of separation without reasonable cause, which the husband failed to establish.

Judgment Excerpts

The instant Appeal assails the judgment and order dated 02.01.2025 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur. Brief facts are that the marriage of the Appellant-wife and the Respondent-husband took place on 05.12.2007 as per the Hindu rites in Nadiyad Khera, Gujarat.

Procedural History

Husband filed divorce petition in Family Court, Bharatpur, which was dismissed on 21.08.2019. Husband appealed to High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur, which allowed the appeal on 02.01.2025. Wife filed SLP in Supreme Court, which was converted into Civil Appeal and allowed on the date of judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13(1)(ia), Section 13(1)(ib)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Maintainability of Civil Suit Challenging MRTP Act Notice — Preliminary Issue Under Section 9A CPC Decided in Favor of Plaintiff. Court holds that bar under Section 149 of MRTP Act does not apply to notices under Section 5...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Tractor Owner and Driver Held Liable for Compensation Despite Insurance Company's Exoneration. Deceased was a Gratuitous Passenger in Tractor Trolley, Not Covered by Insurance Policy; O...