Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in Domestic Violence Case — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Registration of FIR at Shahapur. Writ of Mandamus Cannot Be Issued Without Establishing Illegality or Jurisdictional Error Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India and Section 482 CrPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI
  • 36
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. K.A. Priyanka, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the transfer of investigation in Crime No.206/2020 from the Shahapur police station to the Ballari women police station and to reopen FIR in Crime No.82/2020. The petitioner alleged that she was married to Shashikantha Ikur and after marriage went to her husband's house at Shahapur. She claimed that offences under Sections 498A, 504, 323, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, were committed. The court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel and the High Court Government Pleader, found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any jurisdictional error or illegality in the registration of the FIR at Shahapur. The court observed that the petitioner's remedy, if any, lies before the appropriate forum and not by way of a writ of mandamus. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Investigation - Writ of Mandamus - Articles 226, 227 of Constitution of India, Section 482 CrPC - Petitioner sought transfer of investigation of Crime No.206/2020 from Shahapur to Ballari and reopening of Crime No.82/2020 - Court held that no jurisdictional error was shown and dismissed petition - Held that writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct transfer of investigation without establishing illegality or jurisdictional error (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the transfer of investigation from Shahapur police station to Ballari women police station and reopening of FIR registered at Ballari.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed.

Law Points

  • Writ of mandamus
  • Transfer of investigation
  • Jurisdiction of police to investigate
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (09) 125

Writ Petition No.226407/2020 (GM, RES)

2020-09-25

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Sri Arunkumar Amargundappa (for petitioner), Sri Mallikarjun Sahukar (HCGP for respondents)

Smt. K.A. Priyanka

The Superintendent of Police, Kalaburagi and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking transfer of investigation and reopening of FIR in a domestic violence case.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents 3 and 4 to retransmit case file of Crime No.206/2020 from Shahapur to Ballari women police station and to reopen FIR in Crime No.82/2020.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that after marriage she went to her husband's house at Shahapur and offences under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act were committed; she wanted investigation transferred to Ballari.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus for transfer of investigation from Shahapur to Ballari. Whether the petitioner has shown any jurisdictional error or illegality in the registration of FIR at Shahapur.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the investigation should be transferred to Ballari women police station and FIR in Crime No.82/2020 should be reopened. Respondents (through HCGP) opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

A writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct transfer of investigation without establishing any jurisdictional error or illegality in the registration of FIR. The petitioner's remedy, if any, lies before the appropriate forum.

Judgment Excerpts

It is stated that the petitioner was given in marriage to the one Shashikantha Ikur and after marriage the petitioner went to her husband’s house at Shahapur to lead marital life. The petitioner has not made out any case to issue writ of mandamus as sought for. Accordingly, petition is dismissed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 CrPC seeking transfer of investigation and reopening of FIR. The petition came up for preliminary hearing and was dismissed.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Section 498A, Section 504, Section 323, Section 506, Section 34
  • Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961: Section 3, Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Approval of Resolution Plan for Lack of Standing — Appellant Not an Aggrieved Person Under Section 61 of IBC, 2016. The appellant, not being a party to the CIRP and whose claim was not admitted, lacks locus standi to ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Punjab Police Constable Forfeiture of Service Case. Forfeiture of Past Service Not Reduction in Rank Under Article 311(2) of Constitution of India.