Karnataka High Court Allows Correction of Date of Birth in Service Records Based on School Certificate - Employee Not Required to Produce Birth Certificate at Time of Joining

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 185
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Thimmaiah V, was appointed as a daily wage employee (Mali, Group-D) with the Mysuru City Corporation on 01.05.1986. At the time of joining, he did not submit any document showing his date of birth. Subsequently, when the corporation published a list of time scale employees with effect from 24.11.1995, the appellant noticed that his date of birth was incorrectly recorded as 28.02.1959 instead of 02.04.1966. He made a representation on 07.07.2018 enclosing his school leaving certificate and requested rectification. The second respondent rejected the representation via endorsement dated 01.08.2018. Aggrieved, the appellant filed a writ petition before the learned Single Judge, which was dismissed. The appellant then filed this writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961. The court considered the facts and the school leaving certificate, which showed the correct date of birth as 02.04.1966. The court found that the respondent's rejection was arbitrary and that the appellant was entitled to correction of his date of birth. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the order of the learned Single Judge, and directed the respondents to correct the date of birth in service records and grant consequential benefits.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Date of Birth Correction - School Leaving Certificate as Proof - Karnataka Civil Services Rules - The appellant sought correction of his date of birth from 28.02.1959 to 02.04.1966 based on his school leaving certificate. The court held that the school leaving certificate is a reliable document and the respondent's rejection was arbitrary. The court allowed the correction and set aside the impugned order. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is entitled to correction of his date of birth in service records based on school leaving certificate, and whether the rejection by the respondent was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ appeal is allowed. The order dated 24.07.2020 passed in WP No.2490 of 2020 is set aside. The respondents are directed to correct the date of birth of the appellant as 02.04.1966 in the service records and grant all consequential benefits.

Law Points

  • Date of birth correction
  • service records
  • school leaving certificate
  • Karnataka Civil Services Rules
  • limitation period
  • writ petition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (08) 69

Writ Appeal No.435 of 2020 (S-RES)

2020-08-25

Abhay S. Oka, Chief Justice, Ashok S. Kinagi, J.

Sri. Pratheep K C, Advocate for appellant; Sri. I Tharanath Poojary, AGA for R-1; Smt. Geetha Devi M.P, Advocate for caveator respondent No.2

Thimmaiah V

The Deputy Commissioner, Mysuru District and The Commissioner, Mysuru City Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against dismissal of writ petition seeking correction of date of birth in service records.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought setting aside of order dated 24.07.2020 in WP No.2490 of 2020 and correction of date of birth in service records.

Filing Reason

Appellant's date of birth was wrongly recorded as 28.02.1959 instead of 02.04.1966 in the list of time scale employees.

Previous Decisions

Learned Single Judge dismissed WP No.2490 of 2020 on 24.07.2020.

Issues

Whether the appellant is entitled to correction of date of birth in service records based on school leaving certificate. Whether the rejection of representation by the respondent was justified.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that his date of birth was wrongly recorded and he submitted school leaving certificate as proof. Respondent rejected the representation without valid reasons.

Ratio Decidendi

The school leaving certificate is a reliable document for proof of date of birth, and the respondent's rejection was arbitrary. The appellant is entitled to correction of date of birth in service records.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant noticed that his date of birth was wrongly mentioned as 28.02.1959 instead of 02.04.1966 in the aforesaid list. The second respondent issued an endorsement dated 01.08.2018, as per Annexure-D, rejecting the representation made by the appellant-petitioner for rectification of date of birth.

Procedural History

Appellant filed WP No.2490 of 2020 before learned Single Judge, which was dismissed on 24.07.2020. Appellant then filed this writ appeal under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Insurance Company Liable Despite Dishonour of Cheque for Premium. Dishonour of cheque does not automatically cancel insurance policy; insurer must follow statutory cancellation proced...
Related Judgement
High Court KAHC010822332025_1