High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.5 in Gang Rape and Attempt to Murder Case — Petitioner Enlarged on Bail with Conditions. The court considered the role of the petitioner, completion of investigation, and period of custody under Section 439 CrPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M. Madhukumar @ Maribond, was arraigned as Accused No.5 in Crime No.38/2019 of Kuvempunagar Police Station, Mysuru, for offences punishable under Sections 376(d), 307, 397, 120B and 201 of IPC. The case arose from a complaint by the victim, Kum. Nethravathi, who alleged that she was subjected to gang rape and other offences. The petitioner had been in judicial custody since his arrest. He filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail. The High Court of Karnataka, after hearing the counsel for the petitioner and the State, noted that the charge sheet had been filed and the investigation was complete. The court considered the role attributed to the petitioner and the fact that he was in custody for a considerable period. The court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail, subject to conditions including furnishing a bond, providing sureties, and undertaking not to tamper with evidence or influence witnesses. The petition was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - Regular Bail - Petitioner/Accused No.5 sought bail in a case involving gang rape, attempt to murder, robbery, criminal conspiracy and destruction of evidence - Court considered the role of the petitioner, period of custody, and that investigation was complete - Held that the petitioner is entitled to bail subject to conditions (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, arraigned as Accused No.5 in a case under Sections 376(d), 307, 397, 120B and 201 of IPC, is entitled to regular bail under Section 439 of CrPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the trial court. The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or influence witnesses. The petitioner shall appear before the court on all dates of hearing.

Law Points

  • Bail under Section 439 CrPC
  • Prima facie case
  • Role of accused
  • Custodial interrogation
  • Likelihood of absconding
  • Tampering with witnesses
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (08) 67

Criminal Petition No. 3374 of 2020

2020-08-11

K. Somashekar

Sreenivasan .M.Y, Divakar .M .Maddur

M. Madhukumar @ Maribond

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Regular bail for the petitioner who is Accused No.5 in S.C.No.252/2019 arising out of Crime No.38/2019

Filing Reason

Petitioner sought bail for offences under Sections 376(d), 307, 397, 120B and 201 of IPC

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Section 439 CrPC

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for petitioner prayed for grant of regular bail State opposed the bail application

Ratio Decidendi

The court considered that the charge sheet has been filed, investigation is complete, and the petitioner has been in judicial custody for a considerable period. The court found that the petitioner is entitled to bail subject to conditions to ensure his presence and prevent tampering with evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition is filed by the petitioner who is arraigned as Accused No.5 in S.C.No.252/2019 arose out of Crime No.38/2019 of Kuvempunagar Police Station, Mysuru for the offence punishable under Sections 376(D), 307, 397, 120B and 201 of IPC. The accused is in judicial custody since from the date of his arrest. Therefore, the counsel for the accused is praying for grant of regular bail amongst the grounds urged therein.

Procedural History

The petitioner was arrested in connection with Crime No.38/2019 and was in judicial custody. He filed Criminal Petition No.3374/2020 under Section 439 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka seeking regular bail. The court heard the matter and passed the order on 11.08.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 376(d), 307, 397, 120B, 201
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Sexual Offender Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(ha) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of F...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.5 in Gang Rape and Attempt to Murder Case — Petitioner Enlarged on Bail with Conditions. The court considered the role of the petitioner, completion of investigation, and period of custody under Sec...