High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal as Withdrawn in Family Court Matter — No Adjudication on Merits. Appellants withdrew appeal against order in writ petition, leading to dismissal without any determination of issues.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 113
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, Mr. C.D. Shekar and Mrs. Sudha Shekar, filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging an order dated 09.06.2020 passed in Writ Petition No.5342/2020 by a learned single judge. The respondent was Mrs. Jaya Kiran. When the appeal came up for hearing through video conference, the counsel for the appellants sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. Consequently, the pending interlocutory application was also disposed of. The court did not adjudicate on the merits of the case, as the appeal was withdrawn at the outset.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Withdrawal of Appeal - Dismissal as Withdrawn - No adjudication on merits - Appellants sought permission to withdraw the appeal, which was granted by the court, resulting in dismissal without any determination of the issues raised. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010207982020_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The pending interlocutory application was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • Dismissal as withdrawn
  • No merits adjudication
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 244

Writ Appeal No.398/2020 (GM – FC)

2020-07-08

Abhay S. Oka, Chief Justice, M. Nagaprasanna, J.

Smt. Rama Ramachandra Iyer (for appellants)

Mr. C.D. Shekar and Mrs. Sudha Shekar

Mrs. Jaya Kiran

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against an order in a writ petition under the Karnataka High Court Act.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the order dated 09.06.2020 in Writ Petition No.5342/2020.

Filing Reason

Challenge to an order passed in a writ petition.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 09.06.2020 in Writ Petition No.5342/2020 was challenged.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants' counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court allowed withdrawal of the appeal and dismissed it as withdrawn, without any adjudication on merits.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. The pending interlocutory application does not survive and the same is disposed of.

Procedural History

The appellants filed Writ Appeal No.398/2020 challenging an order dated 09.06.2020 in Writ Petition No.5342/2020. On 08.07.2020, the appeal was heard via video conference, and the appellants' counsel sought withdrawal. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Ostensible Owner's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims Case, Restores Insurer's Liability Due to Incomplete Transfer and Owner-of-Goods Status. Goods Vehicle Passengers Found Accompanying Their Goods Under Section 147 of Motor Vehic...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remits Matter for Fresh Consideration on Specific Charges in Disciplinary Proceedings — High Court's application of natural justice principles was flawed.