High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case — Quarrel Between Neighbors Not Sufficient to Attract Section 306 IPC. The court held that the mere allegation of calling the deceased a prostitute does not constitute instigation to commit suicide under Section 306 IPC, and granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This is a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) filed by four petitioners (accused 1, 3, 6 and 7) seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 189/2019 registered at Viveknagar Police Station, Bengaluru, for the offence under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The prosecution case is that the petitioners and other accused addressed the deceased as a prostitute, which allegedly caused her to feel humiliated and commit suicide by consuming BP tablets. The petitioners' counsel argued that the allegations were baseless and that the incident was merely a quarrel between neighbours. The High Court Government Pleader opposed the petition. The court noted that it had previously granted bail to accused 4 and 5 in Criminal Petition No. 191/2020. The court observed that whether the petitioners actually instigated the deceased to commit suicide is a matter to be proved by the prosecution, and the complaint contents suggest a quarrel between neighbours rather than clear instigation. Considering that petitioners 1, 3 and 4 are women and petitioner No.2 is aged about 19 years, and that their presence can be secured for investigation if needed, the court allowed the petition. The court ordered that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon executing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- each with one surety, subject to conditions including appearing before the investigating officer as required, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without prior permission.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Anticipatory Bail - Section 438 CrPC - Offence under Section 306 IPC - The court considered whether the petitioners, accused of abetting suicide by calling the deceased a prostitute, should be granted anticipatory bail. Held that the contents of the complaint disclose a quarrel between neighbours and not necessarily instigation to commit suicide; thus, bail granted. (Paras 2-3)

B) Indian Penal Code - Abetment of Suicide - Section 306 IPC - Prima Facie Case - The court observed that whether the petitioners instigated the deceased to commit suicide is a matter to be proved by the prosecution, and the mere fact of addressing the deceased as a prostitute may not constitute instigation. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC for the offence under Section 306 IPC based on the allegations of instigation to commit suicide.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- each with one surety, subject to conditions including appearing before the investigating officer as required, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without prior permission.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 306 IPC
  • abetment of suicide
  • instigation
  • prima facie case
  • neighborly quarrel
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 228

Criminal Petition No. 2963/2020

2020-07-01

Sreenivas Harish Kumar

Sri L.Sudarshan (for petitioners), Sri K.S.Abhijith, HCGP (for respondent)

Roja @ Kalaivani, R.Akash, Smt. Bhuvaneshwari @ Beena, Smt. Elam

State by Vivek Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Crime No. 189/2019 for offence under Section 306 IPC

Filing Reason

Petitioners were accused of abetting suicide by calling the deceased a prostitute, leading to her suicide by consuming BP tablets

Previous Decisions

This court had granted bail to accused 4 and 5 in Criminal Petition No. 191/2020

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC for the offence under Section 306 IPC

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners' counsel argued that the allegations are baseless and the incident was a quarrel between neighbours High Court Government Pleader opposed the petition

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that whether the petitioners instigated the deceased to commit suicide is a matter to be proved by the prosecution, and the complaint contents suggest a quarrel between neighbours rather than clear instigation. Therefore, anticipatory bail was granted.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether the petitioners really instigated the deceased to commit suicide or not is a matter to be proved by the prosecution. As the contents of the complaint disclose, it could just be a quarrel between two neighbours.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a petition under Section 438 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No. 189/2019 registered at Viveknagar Police Station for offence under Section 306 IPC. The court heard the petitioners' counsel and the High Court Government Pleader and passed the order on 1st July 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 438
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 306
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case — Quarrel Between Neighbors Not Sufficient to Attract Section 306 IPC. The court held that the mere allegation of calling the deceased a prostitute does not constitute insti...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders in Debt Recovery Proceedings Against Dr. Vijay Mallya. Court upholds the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal to proceed with recovery actions under the Recovery of Debts D...