Karnataka High Court Imposes Fine for Contempt of Court for Willful Disobedience of Interim Order in Land Acquisition Matter. The court held that the accused had prima facie violated the interim order dated 13.11.2019 passed in W.A.Nos.2883-85/2019 and imposed a fine of Rs.5 lakhs to maintain the propriety and majesty of the order.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 48
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The complainant, Sri B.R. Srinivas, filed a contempt petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging that the accused, Sri Sachin Narayan, Managing Director of Dollars Hotel & Resorts Pvt. Ltd., had willfully disobeyed an interim order dated 13.11.2019 passed by a co-ordinate bench of the Karnataka High Court in W.A.Nos.2883-85/2019 (LA-KIADB). The complainant sought to hold the accused guilty of contempt and punish him with imprisonment of six months. The court, after hearing through video conferencing, noted that it had already passed a detailed order on 03.07.2020 holding that the accused had prima facie violated the interim order. Based on the submission made by the learned counsel for the accused, the court imposed a fine of Rs.5 lakhs in order to maintain the propriety and majesty of the order passed by this Court. The court did not impose imprisonment but instead levied a fine as a deterrent measure. The judgment emphasizes the importance of upholding the dignity and authority of court orders and that willful disobedience cannot be tolerated.

Headnote

A) Contempt of Court - Willful Disobedience - Interim Order - The accused was found to have prima facie violated the interim order dated 13.11.2019 passed by the co-ordinate bench in W.A.Nos.2883-85/2019 - Based on submissions of the accused's counsel, the court imposed a fine of Rs.5 lakhs to maintain the propriety and majesty of the order - Held that the accused had willfully disobeyed the court order (Para 1).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the accused is guilty of contempt of court for willful disobedience of the interim order dated 13.11.2019 passed by this Court in W.A.Nos.2883-85/2019 (LA-KIADB).

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court imposed a fine of Rs.5 lakhs on the accused in order to maintain the propriety and majesty of the order passed by this Court. The contempt petition was disposed of accordingly.

Law Points

  • Contempt of Court
  • Willful Disobedience
  • Interim Order
  • Fine
  • Propriety and Majesty of Court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 191

C.C.C.No.315/2020

2020-07-09

B.Veerappa, S.Vishwajith Shetty

Sri M.B.Chandrachooda (for complainant), Sri Sandeep Patil (for accused)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Contempt of court proceedings for alleged willful disobedience of an interim order passed by the High Court in a land acquisition matter.

Remedy Sought

The complainant sought to hold the accused guilty of contempt and punish him with imprisonment of six months.

Filing Reason

Alleged willful disobedience of the interim order dated 13.11.2019 passed by the co-ordinate bench in W.A.Nos.2883-85/2019 (LA-KIADB).

Previous Decisions

The court had passed a detailed order on 03.07.2020 holding that the accused had prima facie violated the interim order.

Issues

Whether the accused is guilty of contempt of court for willful disobedience of the interim order dated 13.11.2019.

Submissions/Arguments

The learned counsel for the accused made submissions based on which the court imposed a fine of Rs.5 lakhs.

Ratio Decidendi

Willful disobedience of a court order amounts to contempt of court, and to maintain the propriety and majesty of the court, a fine may be imposed as a deterrent measure.

Judgment Excerpts

This Court by a detailed order dated 03.07.2020, held that the accused had prima facie violated the interim order dated 13.11.2019 passed by the co-ordinate bench of this Court made in W.A.Nos.2883-85/2019 and based on the submission made by the learned Counsel for the accused, imposed fine of Rs.5 lakhs in order to maintain the propriety and majesty of the order passed by this Court.

Procedural History

The complainant filed CCC No.315/2020 under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 11 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The court passed a detailed order on 03.07.2020 holding prima facie violation. On 09.07.2020, after hearing, the court imposed a fine of Rs.5 lakhs.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 215
  • Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: Sections 11, 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Market Committee Members for Non-Payment of Dues Under Maharashtra APMC Act. Rule 41(1)(i) and (k) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rul...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Imposes Fine for Contempt of Court for Willful Disobedience of Interim Order in Land Acquisition Matter. The court held that the accused had prima facie violated the interim order dated 13.11.2019 passed in W.A.Nos.2883-85/2019 a...