High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal as Settled Out of Court — Parties File Joint Memo for Disposal. Appeal under Section 100 CPC disposed of as settled without adjudication on merits.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 84
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Regular Second Appeal No.185 of 2009 was filed by the appellants (legal representatives of the deceased original appellant H.R. Rangaiah) against the judgment and decree dated 15.10.2008 in R.A.No.272/2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) & JMFC, Turuvekere, which dismissed the appeal and confirmed the judgment and decree dated 08.01.2003 in O.S.No.155/1989 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) & JMFC, Turuvekere. The appeal was filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. During the hearing, the learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo for disposal of the appeal on the ground that the matter had been settled out of court. The memo was signed by all the appellants. The court, noting the settlement, disposed of the appeal as settled without any further adjudication on the merits of the case. No costs were imposed.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Second Appeal - Settlement out of Court - Section 100, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The appeal was filed under Section 100 CPC against concurrent judgments of the trial court and first appellate court. The appellants filed a memo stating the matter was settled out of court, signed by all appellants. The court disposed of the appeal as settled without examining the merits. (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be disposed of as settled out of court based on the joint memo filed by the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is disposed of as settled out of court. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Settlement out of court
  • Disposal of appeal
  • Section 100 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 181

Regular Second Appeal No.185 of 2009

2020-07-10

S Vishwajith Shetty

Sri C.R. Gopalaswamy. A (for appellants), Sri S.N. Bhat (for R5(a, b, d and e))

Smt. Annapoorna, Smt. Nagamma, Sri Krishne Gowda, Sri H.R. Ramesh, Sri H.R. Girish (Lrs. of Deceased Appellant – H.R. Rangaiah)

Smt. Doddamma, Sri Kari Gowda, Sri H.R. Rama Chandra, Sri H.R. Rangappa, Smt. H.R. Gangamma (since dead by LRs: Sri T.N. Manjanna, Sri T.N. Prabhakar, Smt. T.N. Anusuya, Sri T.N. Vasanth Kumar, Sri Nanjundappa)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC against concurrent judgments in a civil suit.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the judgment and decree of the first appellate court and trial court.

Filing Reason

The appellants were aggrieved by the dismissal of their appeal by the first appellate court.

Previous Decisions

Trial court decreed O.S.No.155/1989 on 08.01.2003; first appellate court dismissed R.A.No.272/2006 on 15.10.2008.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be disposed of as settled out of court.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants' counsel filed a memo stating the matter was settled out of court, signed by all appellants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court disposed of the appeal as settled out of court based on the joint memo filed by the appellants, without adjudicating on the merits.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo for disposal of the appeal on the ground that the matter is settled out of the Court. All the appellants have signed the said memo.

Procedural History

The original suit O.S.No.155/1989 was decreed on 08.01.2003 by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) & JMFC, Turuvekere. The first appeal R.A.No.272/2006 was dismissed on 15.10.2008 by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) & JMFC, Turuvekere. The present Regular Second Appeal was filed on an unspecified date and disposed of on 10.07.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 100
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Drug License for Violation of Natural Justice - Licensee Not Given Opportunity of Hearing Before Suspension Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder of Wife by Husband — Knife Attack on Vital Parts Constitutes Murder Under Section 302 IPC. The court affirmed that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through credible eyewitnes...