High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Land Dispute Background and Absence of Specific Caste-Based Intent Led to Bail Under Section 438 CrPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, T N Venkateshappa, V. Arun Kumar, and Smt. Roopa, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.107/2020 registered by Vemgal Police Station, Kolar, for offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 354, 355, 504, 506 read with 34 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The FIR alleged that on 19.05.2020 at about 10.30 a.m., the petitioners abused respondent No.2 and her family members with abusive words, calling out their caste in public view, assaulted them with clubs and hands, and smeared cow-dung on the complainant's face. The court heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned HCGP. The court noted that the records indicated that the incident arose out of a land dispute and the allegations did not prima facie disclose any specific intent to humiliate the complainant on caste basis. The court held that the bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act is not attracted as the allegations do not make out a prima facie case under the Act. Consequently, the court allowed the petition and granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to conditions, including executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each with one surety, appearing before the Investigating Officer as required, and not tampering with evidence or intimidating witnesses.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Section 438 CrPC - Bar under Section 18 SC/ST Act - The court considered whether the bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act applies when the allegations do not prima facie constitute an offence under the Act. Held that if the allegations do not make out a prima facie case under the SC/ST Act, the bar is not attracted and anticipatory bail can be granted. (Paras 3-4)

B) SC/ST Act - Offence under Section 3(1)(r)(s) - Intent to Humiliate - The court examined whether the alleged abuse and assault were intended to humiliate the complainant on caste basis. Held that the FIR did not disclose any specific intent to humiliate on caste grounds, as the incident arose from a land dispute and the caste words were used in the heat of the moment. (Paras 3-4)

C) Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Section 438 CrPC - Conditions - The court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions to ensure investigation and prevent tampering. Held that the petitioners are entitled to bail on executing a bond and complying with conditions. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC for offences under the SC/ST Act and IPC, considering the bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioners are granted anticipatory bail in Crime No.107/2020 of Vemgal Police Station, subject to conditions: each petitioner shall execute a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety; they shall appear before the Investigating Officer as required; they shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses; and they shall not leave the jurisdiction without prior permission.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail
  • SC/ST Act
  • prima facie case
  • caste-based humiliation
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 3(1)(r)(s) SC/ST Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 136

Criminal Petition No.2919 of 2020

2020-07-13

Justice John Michael Cunha

Rakshith R (for petitioners), Thejesh P. (HCGP for respondent)

T N Venkateshappa, V. Arun Kumar, Smt. Roopa

State of Karnataka, Lakshmamma

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought enlargement on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.107/2020

Filing Reason

Petitioners apprehended arrest in connection with FIR alleging offences under IPC and SC/ST Act

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC given the bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act? Whether the allegations in the FIR prima facie constitute an offence under the SC/ST Act?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners' counsel argued that the incident arose out of a land dispute and there was no intent to humiliate on caste basis. HCGP opposed bail citing the bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act does not apply when the allegations do not prima facie make out an offence under the Act. Since the FIR did not disclose specific intent to humiliate on caste basis, the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail.

Judgment Excerpts

The records produced before the Court indicate that this FIR is registered against the petitioners for the alleged offences punishable under sections 323, 324, 354, 355, 327, 504, 506 read with 34 of IPC and section 3(1)(s), 3(1)(r) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. In the FIR, it is alleged that on 19.05.2020 at about 10.30 a.m., petitioners herein abused respondent No.2 and her family members with abusive words, calling out their caste in public view and during the occurrence, they assaulted the complainant and her daughter with clubs and hands and also smeared cow-dung on the face of the complainant.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Criminal Petition No.2919 of 2020 under Section 438 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.107/2020 registered by Vemgal Police Station. The court heard the matter through video conference on 13.07.2020 and passed the order.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 323, 324, 354, 355, 504, 506, 34
  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 18
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 438
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Land Dispute Background and Absence of Specific Caste-Based Intent Led to Bail Under Section 438 CrPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Directing Confirmation of Auction Sale Under Punjab Package Deal Properties (Disposal) Act, 1976. High Court's Intervention Justified as Financial Commissioner's Order Based on Conjectures Without Material Evide...