High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Anticipatory Bail Petition as Withdrawn Due to Pending Application for Same Relief. Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 376(2)(c), 506, 304 IPC and Section 3(1)(w)(i) of SC/ST (POA) Act, but withdrew as another application was pending.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 98
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mahesh Chandrashekar Shanbhag, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.11/2020 registered at Mandya West Police Station, Mandya District, for offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(c) (rape by a person in authority), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), and Section 3(1)(w)(i) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (SC/ST Act). The petitioner was working as a Jailer at Mandya Jail. The respondent No.2, Smt. Mahadevamma, was the complainant. When the petition came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that another application for the same relief was pending consideration before the same Court. Consequently, the counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court recorded the submission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No other legal issues were addressed as the petition was withdrawn at the initial stage.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Anticipatory Bail - Withdrawal of Petition - Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in Crime No.11/2020 for offences under Sections 376(2)(c), 506, 304 IPC and Section 3(1)(w)(i) of SC/ST (POA) Act - Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that another application for the same relief was pending before the same Court - Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn - Held that when another application for same relief is pending, the petition can be withdrawn (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in Crime No.11/2020 for offences under Sections 376(2)(c), 506, 304 IPC and Section 3(1)(w)(i) of SC/ST (POA) Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of petition
  • Pending application
  • Same relief
  • Dismissed as withdrawn
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 134

Criminal Petition No.3049 of 2020

2020-07-06

Justice John Michael Cunha

Sri Venkatesh P. Dalwai (for petitioner), Sri Thejesh P., HCGP (for respondent No.1)

Mahesh Chandrashekar Shanbhag

The State of Karnataka, Smt. Mahadevamma

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought enlargement on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.11/2020.

Filing Reason

Petitioner apprehended arrest in connection with Crime No.11/2020 for offences under Sections 376(2)(c), 506, 304 IPC and Section 3(1)(w)(i) of SC/ST Act.

Previous Decisions

Another application for the same relief was pending consideration before the same Court.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.?

Submissions/Arguments

Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that another application for the same relief is pending consideration of this Court and sought leave to withdraw the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

When another application for the same relief is pending before the same court, the petitioner may withdraw the petition, and the court may dismiss it as withdrawn.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that another application filed for the same relief is pending consideration of this Court and hence, he seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.3049 of 2020 under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail. At the hearing, counsel for petitioner informed that another application for the same relief was pending. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn on 06-07-2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 438
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 376(2)(c), 506, 304
  • Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (SC/ST Act): 3(1)(w)(i)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Anticipatory Bail Petition as Withdrawn Due to Pending Application for Same Relief. Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 376(2)(c), 506, 304 IPC and Section 3(1)(w...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Accident Insurance Claim for Heart Attack Following Motorcycle Fall — 'Outward, Violent and Visible Means' Includes External Trauma Triggering Internal Injury. The Court held that a fall from a motorcycle constitutes an acciden...