High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Assault Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Grievous Hurt and Availability of Civil Remedy. The court held that the medical report did not disclose any grievous injury and the dispute appeared to be civil in nature, thus custodial interrogation was not necessary under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 51
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Sharath @ Sharath Kumar, Santhosh Shetty, Mahesh Shetty, and Shashank, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.53/2020 registered by Balehonnur Police Station, Chikkamagaluru District, for offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 504, 506, 323, 326 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The FIR was lodged by one Naveen. The allegations in the complaint stated that on 24.05.2020 at about 9.45 p.m., the complainant's friends Asif and Munaf brought food to his house on the occasion of Ramzan festival. The complainant's father asked for liquor, and upon Asif's request, Madhu and Annappa brought liquor. Annappa allegedly abused Asif. Later, at about 10.00 p.m., when the complainant went to a shop to buy cigarettes, Sharath and Annappa came and abused him. The petitioners were accused Nos.1, 3, 4, 10 and others. The court heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned High Court Government Pleader. The court observed that the medical report did not indicate any grievous injury and the dispute appeared to be civil in nature. The court held that custodial interrogation of the petitioners was not necessary and granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions including executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety, appearing before the Investigating Officer as required, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without permission. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Anticipatory Bail - Section 438 Cr.P.C. - Prima Facie Case - Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case involving allegations of unlawful assembly and causing grievous hurt - Court held that the medical report did not disclose any grievous injury and the dispute appeared to be civil in nature - Held that custodial interrogation was not necessary and bail was granted subject to conditions (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with Crime No.53/2020 for offences under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 504, 506, 323, 326 read with 149 IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.53/2020 on executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. They shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required, shall not tamper with evidence, and shall not leave the jurisdiction without prior permission.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 Cr.P.C.
  • Prima facie case
  • Grievous hurt
  • Section 326 IPC
  • Civil dispute
  • Unlawful assembly
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 114

Criminal Petition No.2838 of 2020

2020-07-02

John Michael Cunha

Girish B Baladare (for petitioners), Thejesh P. (HCGP for respondent)

Sharath @ Sharath Kumar, Santhosh Shetty, Mahesh Shetty, Shashank

State by Balehonnur Police, Chikkamagaluru District

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought enlargement on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.53/2020.

Filing Reason

Petitioners apprehended arrest in connection with FIR for offences under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 504, 506, 323, 326 read with 149 IPC.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.?

Submissions/Arguments

Learned counsel for petitioners argued for grant of anticipatory bail. Learned HCGP opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The medical report did not disclose any grievous injury and the dispute appeared to be civil in nature, hence custodial interrogation of the petitioners was not necessary and they were entitled to anticipatory bail.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned HCGP. The medical report does not disclose any grievous injury and the dispute appears to be civil in nature. Custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Criminal Petition No.2838 of 2020 under Section 438 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.53/2020 registered by Balehonnur Police Station. The court heard the matter through video conference on 02.07.2020 and passed the order.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 438
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 143, 144, 147, 148, 504, 506, 323, 326, 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Third-Party Shop Owners Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction on Residential Plot. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad's Demolition Order Upheld as High Court's Directions for Removal of Il...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.