Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused No.12 in Murder Case on Ground of Parity with Co-Accused. Petitioner/accused No.12 enlarged on bail under Section 439 CrPC for offences under Sections 143, 109, 364, 147, 148, 302 read with 149 IPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 92
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Prashanth, accused No.12 in Crime No.146/2019 registered by Begur Police Station, Bengaluru, for offences punishable under Sections 143, 109, 364, 147, 148, 302 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail. The petitioner was in judicial custody. The learned counsel for the petitioner produced copies of orders passed by the same Court in Crl.P.No.1432/2020 dated 06.03.2020, Crl.P.No.8746/2019 dated 30.01.2020, and Crl.P.No.840/2020 dated 12.02.2020, wherein accused Nos.6, 7, 9, 11, and 13 were enlarged on bail. The petitioner argued that he stood on the same footing as those co-accused since common allegations were leveled against all accused persons. The learned High Court Government Pleader did not oppose the petition on the ground of parity. The Court, after hearing both sides, found that the petitioner was similarly situated as the co-accused who had already been granted bail. Accordingly, the Court allowed the petition and ordered the petitioner to be enlarged on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties for the likesum, subject to conditions. The Court directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required, not to tamper with prosecution witnesses, and not to involve in any criminal activities.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Parity - Section 439 CrPC - Petitioner/accused No.12 sought bail on ground of parity with co-accused who were already enlarged on bail - Court held that since common allegations were leveled against all accused persons, petitioner stands on same footing as co-accused - Bail granted with conditions (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, accused No.12, is entitled to bail on the ground of parity with co-accused who have already been granted bail.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Petitioner/accused No.12 ordered to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties for the likesum, subject to conditions including appearance before Investigating Officer as required, not tampering with witnesses, and not involving in criminal activities.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Parity
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • Common Allegations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 101

Criminal Petition No.2842 of 2020

2020-07-03

John Michael Cunha

K.A. Chandrashekara (for petitioner), Thejesh P. (HCGP for respondent)

Prashanth

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Enlargement on bail by petitioner/accused No.12

Filing Reason

Petitioner sought bail on ground of parity with co-accused who were already granted bail

Previous Decisions

Co-accused Nos.6, 7, 9, 11, and 13 were enlarged on bail by orders dated 06.03.2020 in Crl.P.No.1432/2020, 30.01.2020 in Crl.P.No.8746/2019, and 12.02.2020 in Crl.P.No.840/2020

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail on the ground of parity with co-accused who have been granted bail?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner stands on the same footing as co-accused who were already enlarged on bail as common allegations are leveled against all accused persons. HCGP did not oppose the petition on the ground of parity.

Ratio Decidendi

Where common allegations are leveled against all accused persons, a co-accused is entitled to bail on the ground of parity if other similarly situated co-accused have already been granted bail.

Judgment Excerpts

Present petitioner stand on the same footing as the accused who are already enlarged on bail as common allegations are leveled against all the accused persons. Hence, extending the benefit of the above orders to the present petitioner namely accused No.12, on the ground of parity, this petition is allowed with the following conditions.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Crl.P.No.2842/2020 under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail in Cr.No.146/2019 (S.C.No.89/2020) registered by Begur Police Station. The Court heard the matter through video conference and passed the order on 03.07.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 143, 109, 364, 147, 148, 302, 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case. 'ULTRATUFF' Held Deceptively Similar to 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Section 324 IPC Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Independent Evidence. The appellate court's acquittal was upheld as the prosecution failed to prove th...