High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition for Alternative Remedy in Private Security License Dispute. Availability of Statutory Appeal Under Private Security (Regulation) Act, 2005 Precludes Writ Jurisdiction.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Black Belt Detectives Private Limited, a detective agency, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 23.01.2020 passed by the Additional Director General of Police, Internal Security Division (respondent no.2). The grievance was against the respondent's insistence on dropping the word 'Detectives' from the company name as a precondition for considering the grant or renewal of a license under the Private Security (Regulation) Act, 2005 and the Karnataka Private Security Agencies Rules, 2008. The respondents, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, opposed the petition primarily on the ground that an alternative and equally efficacious statutory remedy of appeal was available under the Act and Rules. The court, after hearing the parties, found merit in the objection and held that the writ petition should not be entertained when an alternative remedy exists. Consequently, the court disposed of the petition by relegating the petitioner to the remedy of appeal. The registry was directed to return the impugned order to the petitioner after retaining a copy in the file.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Alternative Remedy - Maintainability of Writ Petition - Availability of Statutory Appeal - The petitioner challenged the insistence on dropping the word 'Detectives' as a precondition for license renewal under the Private Security (Regulation) Act, 2005 and Karnataka Private Security Agencies Rules, 2008. The court held that since an alternative and equally efficacious remedy of appeal is available under the Act/Rules, the writ petition is not maintainable and relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ petition is maintainable when an alternative statutory remedy of appeal is available under the Private Security (Regulation) Act, 2005 and the Karnataka Private Security Agencies Rules, 2008.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed off relegating the petitioner to the remedy of appeal. Registry shall return the impugned order to the petitioner forthwith after retaining a copy thereof in the file.

Law Points

  • Alternative remedy
  • Writ jurisdiction
  • Private Security (Regulation) Act
  • 2005
  • Karnataka Private Security Agencies Rules
  • 2008
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 40

Writ Petition No.4999 of 2020 (GM - RES)

2020-07-03

Justice Krishna S. Dixit

Sri.Sailesh S Katarey (for petitioner), Sri.P.B.Achappa (for respondents)

Black Belt Detectives Private Limited

State of Karnataka, Additional Director General of Police

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Additional Director General of Police regarding license renewal.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 23.01.2020 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent no.2.

Filing Reason

The respondent insisted on dropping the word 'Detectives' from the petitioner's name as a precondition for considering license grant/renewal.

Issues

Whether the writ petition is maintainable in view of the availability of an alternative statutory remedy of appeal.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Challenged the insistence on dropping the word 'Detectives' as a precondition for license renewal. Respondents: Opposed the petition on the ground of availability of alternative and equally efficacious statutory remedy of appeal under the Act/Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

When an alternative and equally efficacious statutory remedy of appeal is available under the Act/Rules, the writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable and the petitioner must be relegated to the appellate remedy.

Judgment Excerpts

The grievance of the petitioner who claims to be running a detective agency is against the insistence of the answering respondent on dropping the word 'Detectives' as a precondition for consideration of his claim for the grant/renewal of license under the provisions of Private Security (Regulation) Act, 2005 and Karnataka Private Security Agencies Rules, 2008. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed off relegating the petitioner to the remedy of appeal.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 23.01.2020. The respondents opposed on the ground of alternative remedy. The court disposed of the petition on 03.07.2020 relegating the petitioner to the appellate remedy.

Acts & Sections

  • Private Security (Regulation) Act, 2005:
  • Karnataka Private Security Agencies Rules, 2008:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Parents' Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Holds That 'Accidental Falling' Includes Falling Due to Dizziness or Fits, Not Only Bumping Against Objects. Tribunal Erred in Narrow Interpretation of 'Accidental Fal...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for stabbing death set aside as sole eyewitness was brother of deceased and testimony suf...