High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Long Incarceration and Trial Delay. Petitioner, accused of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, granted bail under Section 439 CrPC after 2 years 7 months in custody as trial had not commenced.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shaheed Pasha @ Chota Shaheed, was accused No.1 in S.C.No.586/2018 pending before the LXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Court, Bengaluru, for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. The case arose from Crime No.379/2017 registered by D.J. Halli Police Station. It was alleged that due to previous ill-will, the petitioner and two other accused conspired to murder Shaikh Rizwan. On 21.12.2017 at 11.45 p.m., they secured the victim near Umar Farooq Masjid road, and the petitioner stabbed the victim on his chest with a dagger, while accused Nos.2 and 3 assaulted him on his hand, resulting in his death. The petitioner had been in custody since 22.12.2017. His previous bail application in Crl.P.No.6041/2018 was dismissed on 22.11.2018. The present petition was filed under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail. The court noted that the petitioner had been in custody for about 2 years and 7 months, the trial had not yet commenced, and only one witness had been examined. The court held that further detention would be violative of Article 21 of the Constitution and granted bail subject to conditions including executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties, surrendering passport, appearing before the court regularly, and not tampering with evidence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - Long Incarceration - The petitioner, accused of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, had been in custody since 22.12.2017. The trial had not commenced and only one witness was examined. The court held that further detention would be violative of Article 21 of the Constitution and granted bail subject to conditions. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, accused of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC given the long period of incarceration and delay in trial.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner shall be released on bail in Crime No.379/2017 of D.J. Halli Police Station, subject to executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the trial court. The petitioner shall surrender his passport, appear before the court on all hearing dates, and not tamper with prosecution evidence.

Law Points

  • Bail under Section 439 CrPC
  • Long incarceration
  • Trial delay
  • Right to speedy trial
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 31

Criminal Petition No.1179/2020

2020-07-10

K.S.Mudagal

B. Lethif (for petitioner), R.D. Renukaradhya (HCGP for respondent)

Shaheed Pasha @ Chota Shaheed

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Enlargement of the petitioner on bail in Crime No.379/2017 for offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC

Filing Reason

Petitioner had been in custody since 22.12.2017 and trial had not commenced, seeking bail on grounds of long incarceration and delay in trial.

Previous Decisions

Previous bail application in Crl.P.No.6041/2018 was dismissed on 22.11.2018.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC given the long period of incarceration and delay in trial.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he had been in custody for about 2 years 7 months and trial had not commenced, only one witness examined. Respondent opposed bail citing seriousness of offence.

Ratio Decidendi

Long incarceration of about 2 years 7 months and delay in trial (only one witness examined) warrants grant of bail under Section 439 CrPC, as further detention would be violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner is accused No.1 in S.C.No.586/2018 on the file of LXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Court (CCH-67), Bengaluru. It is alleged that due to some previous ill-will, petitioner and other two accused conspired to commit murder of Shaikh Rizwan. The previous bail application of the petitioner in Crl.P.No.6041/2018 was dismissed on 22.11.2018. The petitioner is in custody from 22.12.2017. The trial has not yet commenced. Only one witness has been examined. In the light of the above, further detention of the petitioner would be violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Procedural History

The petitioner was arrested on 22.12.2017 in connection with Crime No.379/2017 for offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. Charge sheet was filed and the case was committed to Sessions Court as S.C.No.586/2018. Previous bail application (Crl.P.No.6041/2018) was dismissed on 22.11.2018. The present petition was filed on 10.07.2020 and allowed on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Long Incarceration and Trial Delay. Petitioner, accused of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, granted bail under Section 439 CrPC after 2 years 7 months in custody a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Against Tribunal Order Directing Posting and Salary to Suspended Police Officer. Held that non-posting without salary amounts to deemed suspension and violates principles of natural justice.