Karnataka High Court Dismisses Contractor's Writ Petition as Withdrawn in Tender Dispute. The petition filed under Article 226 challenging rejection of appeals was dismissed after the petitioner opted to participate in fresh tenders instead.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a contractor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court, challenging an order dated 22.05.2019 passed by the first respondent rejecting its appeals. The petition was filed against the Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Corporation Limited and several other parties. During the proceedings, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition, stating that the petitioner intended to participate in fresh tenders called for by the respondents. Accepting the memo, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal issues were adjudicated, and the matter concluded purely on a procedural note.

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010028222020_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn in light of the memo filed by the petitioner.

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 21

Writ Petition No.2531/2020 (GM-TEN)

2020-07-07

S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

D. R. Ravishankar for petitioner; Pradeep Naik for Respondent 7; S. Sriranga for Respondents 1 to 3

Skill Tech Engineers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd.

Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Corporation Limited & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejection of appeals.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 22.05.2019 rejecting the appeals filed by the petitioner.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's appeals were rejected by respondent 1.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 22.05.2019 passed by respondent 1 rejecting the appeals.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner filed memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition to participate in fresh tenders called for by the respondents.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition as he intends to participate in the fresh tenders called for by the respondents. In light of the memo, petition is dismissed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed the writ petition under Article 226 challenging the order dated 22.05.2019 rejecting appeals. During pendency, the petitioner filed a memo seeking withdrawal to participate in fresh tenders. The court accepted the memo and dismissed the petition as withdrawn on 07.07.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Contractor's Writ Petition as Withdrawn in Tender Dispute. The petition filed under Article 226 challenging rejection of appeals was dismissed after the petitioner opted to participate in fresh tenders instead.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Defective Sanction and Probable Defence. Demand for Amount Held to Be Visit Fees and Medicine Expenses, Not Illegal Gratification, Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Preven...