High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bail Petition as Withdrawn in POCSO and SC/ST Act Case — Petitioner's Counsel Seeks Withdrawal Due to Lack of Instructions. Court Permits Withdrawal and Dismisses Petition as Withdrawn Without Examining Merits.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 111
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri Ravi, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime No.50/2019 registered at Holenarasipura Rural Police Station, Hassan District, for offences punishable under Sections 448 (house-trespass) and 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 4 (penetrative sexual assault) and 6 (aggravated penetrative sexual assault) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015. The victim, Preethi Y.R., aged about 16 years, was represented by her guardian Smt. Nagamma. The State of Karnataka was the first respondent. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition as not pressed. Upon enquiry, the counsel submitted that there were no instructions from the petitioner. In view of the memo and the lack of instructions, the court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No arguments on merits were advanced, and the court did not examine the factual allegations or legal issues. The petition was disposed of without any finding on the merits of the bail application.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Withdrawal of Petition - Section 439 Cr.P.C. - Petitioner's counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the bail petition as not pressed due to lack of instructions from the petitioner - Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn - Held that when counsel has no instructions, the petition cannot be pursued and is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner should be granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 448, 376 IPC, Sections 4, 6 of POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 2015.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The court permitted the withdrawal based on the memo filed by the petitioner's counsel.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of petition
  • lack of instructions
  • dismissal as withdrawn
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 16

Criminal Petition No.8710/2019

2020-07-08

H.P. Sandesh

Sri Pratheep K.C. (for petitioner), Sri Diwakar Maddur (HCGP for R-1)

Sri Ravi

The State of Karnataka, Preethi Y.R. (represented by guardian Smt. Nagamma)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought enlargement on bail in Crime No.50/2019 for offences under IPC, POCSO Act, and SC/ST (POA) Act.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was arrested and sought bail.

Issues

Whether the petitioner should be granted bail.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition as not pressed due to lack of instructions from the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi

When a petitioner's counsel has no instructions and seeks withdrawal, the court may permit withdrawal and dismiss the petition as withdrawn without adjudicating on merits.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition as not pressed. On enquiry, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no instructions from the petitioner. In view of the memo filed, the learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.8710/2019 under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking bail. During hearing, counsel filed a memo to withdraw. Court dismissed as withdrawn.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 448, 376
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act): 4, 6
  • Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015 (SC/ST (POA) Act): 3(2)(va)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Recovery and Hearsay Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Dispute — High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reappraising Factual Findings. Compensation Paid Through Assessee to Former Agents Not Deductible Under Section 10(2)(xv) of Income-tax Act,...