High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Service Regularization Case — Daily Wage Employee Not Entitled to Regularization Without Sanctioned Post. Claim for Regularization Rejected as Petitioner Was Appointed Without Following Recruitment Rules and No Right to Regularization Exists in Absence of Sanctioned Post.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Prosecution
  • 202
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Chikkappa, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dated 12.02.2016 in W.P.No.81636/2011, which dismissed his petition seeking regularization of services. The appellant had joined the Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Limited (KBJNL) as a daily wage employee in 1979 and worked until 2011. He sought regularization, but the respondents rejected his claim. The Single Judge dismissed the writ petition, leading to the present appeal. The Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court, comprising Justice G. Narendar and Justice M. Nagaprasanna, heard the appeal. The court noted that the appellant was a daily wage employee and that there was no sanctioned post for him to be regularized. The court held that regularization cannot be claimed as a matter of right without a sanctioned post and without following the recruitment rules. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the order of the Single Judge.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Regularization - Daily Wage Employee - Claim for Regularization - Petitioner joined as daily wage employee in 1979 and worked till 2011 - Claim for regularization rejected by respondents - Single Judge dismissed writ petition - Appeal dismissed - Held that regularization cannot be claimed as a matter of right without a sanctioned post and without following recruitment rules (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a daily wage employee who worked for several years is entitled to regularization of services in the absence of a sanctioned post and without following recruitment rules.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The order of the Single Judge dated 12.02.2016 in W.P.No.81636/2011 is affirmed.

Law Points

  • Regularization of service
  • daily wage employee
  • sanctioned post
  • recruitment rules
  • Karnataka High Court Act Section 4
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (02) 52

Writ Appeal No.200108/2016 (S-REG)

2020-02-17

G. Narendar, M. Nagaprasanna

Sri S. D. Sagari (for appellant), Sri Sanjay M. Joshi (for respondents R2 to R4)

Chikkappa S/o Ramalingappa Masali

The Chief Secretary, Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd. (deleted), The Chief Engineer, Managing Director, K.B.J.N.L., Almatti, The Chief Engineer, K.B.J.N.L., I.B.C., Sub-Division No.21, Kembhavi, The Assistant Executive Engineer, M.L.I. Sub Division No.1, Mattihal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Service matter - Regularization of daily wage employee

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought setting aside of order dated 12.02.2016 in W.P.No.81636/2011 and regularization of services

Filing Reason

Appellant's claim for regularization was rejected by respondents and writ petition was dismissed by Single Judge

Previous Decisions

Single Judge dismissed W.P.No.81636/2011 on 12.02.2016

Issues

Whether the appellant is entitled to regularization of services as a daily wage employee without a sanctioned post and without following recruitment rules?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that he worked for many years and should be regularized. Respondents opposed regularization citing lack of sanctioned post and recruitment rules.

Ratio Decidendi

A daily wage employee cannot claim regularization as a matter of right in the absence of a sanctioned post and without following the recruitment rules.

Judgment Excerpts

Aggrieved by the order passed in Writ Petition No.81636/2011 dated 12.02.2016 whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition pertaining to the claim of regularization of the services of the petitioner, the writ petitioner has preferred the instant appeal. Brief facts of the case are as follows: The petitioner joined the services of respondent Karnataka Bhagya Jala Nigam Limited as a daily wage employee in the year 1979.

Procedural History

The appellant filed W.P.No.81636/2011 seeking regularization of services. The Single Judge dismissed the petition on 12.02.2016. The appellant then filed the present writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against Tribunal Order Setting Aside Suspension of CHA License. Commissioner's Suspension Order Under Regulation 21(2) of CHALR, 2004 Upheld as Reasonable and Not Requiring Prior Show Cause Notice.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Recovery of Deficiency in Forest Contract Auction for Non-Compliance with Article 299(1) of Constitution. Government Cannot Invoke Implied Contract to Recover Amount as Arrears of Land Revenue under Section 155(b) of Madhya Prad...