High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Lease Dispute. Court Appoints Arbitrator Based on Arbitration Clause in Lease Deed Dated 22/11/2016.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 62
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Campus Students Communities Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a lease deed dated 22/11/2016 executed between the petitioner and the respondent, M/s Bagamane Enterprises. The lease deed contained an arbitration clause. The petitioner contended that disputes had arisen and the respondent failed to cooperate in appointing an arbitrator. The respondent did not oppose the petition. The court, after prima facie satisfaction of the existence of an arbitration agreement, allowed the petition and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes. The court noted that the power under Section 11(6) is to be exercised when parties fail to agree on the appointment procedure. The decision was based on the arbitration clause in the lease deed and the failure of the parties to mutually appoint an arbitrator.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Existence of Arbitration Agreement - Petitioner sought appointment of arbitrator under Section 11(6) based on arbitration clause in lease deed dated 22/11/2016 executed between petitioner and respondent - Court found that the lease deed contained an arbitration agreement and parties had failed to agree on appointment - Held that the court can exercise power under Section 11(6) to appoint an arbitrator (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, given the existence of an arbitration clause in the lease deed dated 22/11/2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising out of the lease deed dated 22/11/2016.

Law Points

  • Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996 empowers the court to appoint an arbitrator when parties fail to agree on the appointment procedure
  • existence of an arbitration agreement is a prerequisite
  • court's role is prima facie review of the arbitration agreement.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (09) 56

CMP No. 461 of 2022

2022-09-23

Suraj Govindaraj

Sri. Anupam Agarwal (for petitioner), Sri. A Ravishankar (for respondent)

Campus Students Communities Pvt Ltd

M/s Bagamane Enterprises

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought appointment of an arbitrator as per the arbitration clause in the lease deed dated 22/11/2016.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose between the parties under the lease deed, and the respondent failed to cooperate in appointing an arbitrator.

Issues

Whether an arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the lease deed contained an arbitration clause and disputes had arisen, but the respondent did not cooperate in appointing an arbitrator. Respondent did not oppose the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court may appoint an arbitrator when parties fail to agree on the appointment procedure, provided there is a valid arbitration agreement.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a) To exercise the power under the Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appoint an Arbitrator as per the agreed terms of the Lease Deed dated 22/11/2016 executed between the Petitioner and Respondents as detailed in Annexure No.A to arbitrate the dispute that have arisen between the Petitioner and Respondent.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed CMP No. 461 of 2022 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator. The matter came up for admission before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru on 23rd September 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11(6)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Lease Dispute. Court Appoints Arbitrator Based on Arbitration Clause in Lease Deed Dated 22/11/2016.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution in Banking Dispute — Suit Transferred to Debt Recovery Tribunal Under RDB Act, 1993. Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous Due to Transfer of Suit to Debt Recovery Tribunal.