High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.1 in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. The court found discrepancies in the prosecution's case and held that the petitioner, a woman, was entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC for offences under Sections 302, 120B, and 34 IPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 94
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Nethra, accused No.1, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in C.C.No.252/2022 arising out of Crime No.530/2021 registered at Madanayakanahalli Police Station, Bengaluru Rural District, for offences punishable under Sections 302 (murder), 120B (criminal conspiracy), and 34 (common intention) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The bail application was earlier rejected by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural, in Criminal Miscellaneous No.2009/2021 on 17.02.2022. The prosecution alleged that on 07.11.2021 at about 1.30 p.m., the petitioner along with other accused conspired and murdered the deceased. The petitioner, being a woman, argued that there was no direct evidence linking her to the conspiracy and that the allegations were based on suspicion. The State opposed bail citing the seriousness of the offence. The court, after hearing both sides, observed that the prosecution's case primarily relied on circumstantial evidence and that the petitioner's role was not clearly established. The court noted discrepancies in the prosecution's version and held that the petitioner, being a woman, was entitled to bail. The court granted bail subject to conditions including furnishing a bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties, not tampering with evidence, and appearing before the trial court regularly.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - Murder and Conspiracy - The petitioner sought bail in a case involving murder and criminal conspiracy. The court considered the lack of direct evidence linking the petitioner to the conspiracy and the discrepancies in the prosecution's case. Held that bail should be granted as the petitioner is a woman and there is no prima facie material to show her involvement in the conspiracy (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, accused No.1, is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC for offences under Sections 302, 120B, and 34 IPC, given the allegations of conspiracy and murder.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Petitioner granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including not tampering with evidence and appearing before the trial court regularly.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Murder
  • Conspiracy
  • Prima Facie Case
  • Discrepancies in Evidence
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 120B IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
  • Section 439 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (04) 42

Criminal Petition No.2306 of 2022

2022-05-12

M. Nagaprasanna

Sri Hashmath Pasha (Senior Advocate) for Sri Chandrashekar R.P. (Advocate) for petitioner; Sri V.S. Vinayaka (HCGP) for respondent

Nethra

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Enlargement on bail in C.C.No.252/2022 arising out of Crime No.530/2021

Filing Reason

Petitioner is accused No.1 in a murder and conspiracy case and seeks bail after rejection by Sessions Court

Previous Decisions

Bail rejected by Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural in Criminal Miscellaneous No.2009 of 2021 on 17.02.2022

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC for offences under Sections 302, 120B, and 34 IPC

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that there is no direct evidence linking her to the conspiracy and that she is a woman entitled to bail State opposed bail citing seriousness of the offence and that the petitioner is accused of murder

Ratio Decidendi

Bail should be granted when there is no prima facie material to show involvement in conspiracy and the accused is a woman, considering the discrepancies in the prosecution case.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking enlargement on bail in C.C.No.252 of 2022 arising out of Crime No.530 of 2021 registered for offences punishable under Section 302, 120B and 34 of the IPC, it having been turned down by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural in Criminal Miscellaneous No.2009 of 2021, on 17.02.2022.

Procedural History

Crime No.530/2021 registered at Madanayakanahalli Police Station; charge sheet filed leading to C.C.No.252/2022; bail application before Sessions Court rejected on 17.02.2022; present petition filed under Section 439 CrPC before High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 120B, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Upholds Maintenance Order for Mother Under Senior Citizens Act — Sons Directed to Pay Rs.10,000 Monthly. Deputy Commissioner's Enhancement of Maintenance from Rs.5,000 to Rs.10,000 per Son Upheld as Reasonable Under Section 4 of Maintena...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.1 in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. The court found discrepancies in the prosecution's case and held that the petitioner, a woman, was entitled to bail under Section 43...