Case Note & Summary
The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by the State of Karnataka and its officers against an order of a learned Single Judge dated 04.10.2021 in W.P. No.103751/2021. The respondent, Kumari Rohini, daughter of Narayan Yaligar, had earlier filed W.P. No.108382/2019 seeking freedom fighters pension under the Karnataka Freedom Fighters Pension Rules, 1981. That writ petition was allowed on 18.09.2019, quashing the order dated 22.10.2018 passed by the first appellant and remitting the matter to appellant No.1 to reconsider the claim afresh in accordance with law within two months. However, the State failed to pass any orders within the stipulated time. Consequently, the respondent filed W.P. No.103751/2021 seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the appellants to comply with the earlier direction. The learned Single Judge allowed that writ petition, directing the appellants to comply with the earlier order and pass appropriate orders regarding grant of freedom fighters pension together with arrears. Aggrieved, the State filed the present writ appeal. The Division Bench, after hearing the parties, dismissed the appeal, holding that the State cannot ignore judicial orders and must comply with the directions. The court found no merit in the appeal and upheld the order of the learned Single Judge.
Headnote
A) Administrative Law - Judicial Orders - Compliance - Writ of Mandamus - The State is bound to comply with judicial orders passed by a competent court. Failure to comply with a direction to reconsider a claim within a specified period amounts to contempt and justifies issuance of a writ of mandamus to enforce compliance. The court held that the State cannot sit over the directions of the court and must act in accordance with law. (Paras 2-5)
B) Pension Law - Freedom Fighters Pension - Reconsideration of Claim - Karnataka Freedom Fighters Pension Rules, 1981 - The respondent, daughter of a freedom fighter, sought pension. The earlier writ petition was allowed quashing the rejection order and directing reconsideration. The State failed to pass orders within the stipulated time. The subsequent writ petition seeking compliance was allowed by the learned Single Judge, directing the State to comply. The Division Bench upheld this order, dismissing the appeal. (Paras 1-6)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the State is justified in not complying with the earlier direction of the learned Single Judge to reconsider the respondent's claim for freedom fighters pension, and whether the subsequent writ petition seeking compliance was maintainable.
Final Decision
The Division Bench dismissed the writ appeal, upholding the order of the learned Single Judge dated 04.10.2021 in W.P. No.103751/2021, directing the appellants to comply with the earlier direction and pass appropriate orders regarding grant of freedom fighters pension together with arrears.
Law Points
- Judicial orders must be complied with
- Writ of mandamus can be issued to enforce compliance
- State cannot ignore court directions
- Freedom fighters pension claim must be reconsidered
Case Details
2023 LawText (KAR) (07) 62
Writ Appeal No. 100204 of 2022 (GM-FF)
Vidyavathi M. Kotturshettar, V.S. Kalasurmath, H.M. Dharigond, Sangeetha F. Kallimani
The State of Karnataka, The Deputy Commissioner, The Assistant Commissioner, The Joint Director
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Writ appeal against order directing compliance of earlier judicial order regarding freedom fighters pension
Remedy Sought
The appellants sought to set aside the order of the learned Single Judge dated 04.10.2021 in W.P. No.103751/2021
Filing Reason
The State failed to comply with the earlier direction to reconsider the respondent's claim for freedom fighters pension within two months, leading to the respondent filing a writ petition for compliance, which was allowed.
Previous Decisions
W.P. No.108382/2019 was allowed on 18.09.2019, quashing the order dated 22.10.2018 and directing reconsideration within two months. W.P. No.103751/2021 was allowed on 04.10.2021 directing compliance.
Issues
Whether the State is justified in not complying with the earlier direction of the learned Single Judge to reconsider the respondent's claim for freedom fighters pension?
Whether the subsequent writ petition seeking compliance was maintainable?
Submissions/Arguments
Appellants argued that the learned Single Judge erred in allowing the writ petition and directing compliance.
Respondent argued that the State failed to comply with the earlier order and the writ petition was maintainable to enforce compliance.
Ratio Decidendi
The State is bound to comply with judicial orders passed by a competent court. Failure to comply with a direction to reconsider a claim within a specified period justifies issuance of a writ of mandamus to enforce compliance. The court cannot allow the State to ignore its directions.
Judgment Excerpts
The appellants in this writ appeal have questioned the correctness and validity of the order dated 04.10.2021, passed in W.P. No.103751/2021, wherein the learned single Judge by allowing the writ petition directed the appellants to comply with the directions issued by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.108382/2019 dated 18.09.2019 and to pass appropriate orders regarding grant of freedom fighters pension together with all arrears in favour of the respondent.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. We are of the considered opinion that the learned Single Judge was justified in allowing the writ petition and directing the appellants to comply with the earlier order. The appeal is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed.
Procedural History
The respondent filed W.P. No.108382/2019 seeking freedom fighters pension, which was allowed on 18.09.2019 quashing the rejection order and directing reconsideration within two months. The State failed to comply. The respondent then filed W.P. No.103751/2021 seeking a writ of mandamus to enforce compliance, which was allowed on 04.10.2021. The State filed the present writ appeal against that order.
Acts & Sections
- Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
- Karnataka Freedom Fighters Pension Rules, 1981:
