High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.3 in Murder Case for Supplying Weapon and Motorcycle. Petitioner's role was limited to supplying weapon and motorcycle; custodial interrogation not required under Section 439 CrPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Yuvaraj Nimbalkar, accused No.3, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in connection with Crime No. 207/2020 of Karatagi Police Station, registered for offences under Sections 302, 307, 109 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The case arises from an incident on 17.10.2020 where a suo moto complaint was lodged by police personnel on patrolling duty. The charge sheet alleges that the sister of accused No.1, Triveni, belonging to Hindu Maratha community, married Vinod Malali of Hindu Reddy community on 12.05.2020 under the Special Marriage Act. Enraged by the inter-caste marriage, accused No.1 gave a supari (contract) to kill his sister, promising money to accused No.4, who introduced accused No.2 for the murder. The role assigned to the petitioner is that he actively cooperated with accused No.2 by supplying the weapon used in the incident and giving his Hero Honda Splendor Plus motorcycle without registration number. The petitioner argued that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated, with no direct role in the murder. The State opposed the bail application. The court, after hearing both sides, observed that the role of the petitioner is not direct and custodial interrogation is not required. The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to conditions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - Prima Facie Case - Petitioner accused No.3 charged with supplying weapon and motorcycle for murder - Court held that the role of petitioner is not direct and custodial interrogation not required - Bail granted (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, accused No.3, is entitled to bail under Section 439 of CrPC for offences under Sections 302, 307, 109 read with 34 of IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail in S.C. No. 89/2021 (Crime No. 207/2020) of Karatagi Police Station for offences under Sections 302, 307, 109 read with 34 of IPC, pending before I Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Koppal sitting at Gangavati, subject to conditions.

Law Points

  • Bail under Section 439 CrPC
  • Prima facie case
  • Role of accused
  • Custodial interrogation not required
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (06) 12

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100576 OF 2023

2023-06-19

V. Srishananda

Suraj Mutnal, Girija S. Hiremath

Shri. Yuvaraj Nimbalkar

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks bail in S.C. No. 89/2021 (Crime No. 207/2020) for offences under Sections 302, 307, 109 read with 34 of IPC

Filing Reason

Petitioner is accused No.3 charged with supplying weapon and motorcycle for murder of sister of accused No.1 due to inter-caste marriage

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC given his role of supplying weapon and motorcycle

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he is innocent and falsely implicated, with no direct role in the murder State opposed bail citing seriousness of offences

Ratio Decidendi

The role of the petitioner is not direct and custodial interrogation is not required; hence bail is granted under Section 439 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard Sri.Suraj Mutnal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent - State. Petitioner is accused No.3 facing charges for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 307 of IPC in respect of an incident that has occurred on 17.10.2020 The role assigned to the present petitioner in the charge sheet is that he actively co-operated with accused No.2 inasmuch as he has supplied the weapon used in the incident and also gave his Hero Honda Splendor Plus motorcycle

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Petition No. 100576 of 2023 under Section 439 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, seeking bail in S.C. No. 89/2021 arising from Crime No. 207/2020 of Karatagi Police Station. The petition was heard and disposed of on 19.06.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 307, 109, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Non-Examination of Key Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder and Acquittal of Co-Accused in SC/ST Act Case — Evidence of Common Intention Lacking for Acquitted Accused. The court confirmed the conviction under Section 302 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of S...