High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Long Incarceration. The court allowed the successive bail petition under Section 439 CrPC, finding that the petitioner, accused No.5, was not in conscious possession of the ganja found in the car's dicky, and the FSL report did not directly implicate him.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 279
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mr. Sayyad Mohammad @ Nasim, filed a successive bail petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail in Crime No.30/2021 registered by the Economic and Narcotic Crime Police Station, Mangaluru City, for offences punishable under Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), Sections 4 and 25(1B)(b) of the Arms Act, 1959, and Section 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The petitioner was accused No.5 and had been in custody for 1 year and 7 months. His earlier bail petition (Crl.P.No.3484/2022) was rejected on 07.06.2022 with liberty to approach the court after receipt of the FSL report. The FSL report was subsequently received, prompting the present petition. The prosecution's case involved the seizure of 60 kilograms of ganja from a car and 217.740 kilograms from a lorry. The petitioner was allegedly present in the car, but the ganja was found in the dicky, not in his conscious possession. The petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner was not the owner of the car or lorry and had no connection with the larger seizure. The State opposed bail, citing the commercial quantity of ganja and the presumption under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The court, after hearing both sides, noted that the FSL report did not directly implicate the petitioner and that the petitioner had been in custody for a substantial period. The court held that the petitioner was not in conscious possession of the contraband and that the rigors of Section 37 were not attracted. Consequently, the court allowed the petition and granted bail to the petitioner on certain conditions, including furnishing a bond of Rs.2,00,000 with two sureties, reporting to the police station once a month, and not tampering with evidence or leaving the jurisdiction without permission.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Successive Bail Petition - Section 439 CrPC - The petitioner, accused No.5, sought bail after earlier rejection, with liberty to approach after FSL report. The court considered the FSL report and the fact that the petitioner was not in conscious possession of the contraband found in the car's dicky, and granted bail subject to conditions. (Paras 1-6)

B) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Conscious Possession - Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) - The court held that the petitioner, being a passenger in the car, was not in conscious possession of the ganja kept in the dicky, and the presumption under Section 37 was not attracted as the FSL report did not directly implicate him. (Paras 4-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC in a case involving commercial quantity of ganja under the NDPS Act, given the FSL report and long incarceration.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond of Rs.2,00,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including reporting to the police station once a month, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without permission.

Law Points

  • Bail under Section 439 CrPC
  • Successive bail petition
  • Conscious possession under NDPS Act
  • Commercial quantity presumption under Section 37 NDPS Act
  • FSL report relevance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (01) 11

Criminal Petition No.10123/2022

2023-01-11

H.P. Sandesh

S. Balakrishnan (for petitioner), H.S. Shankar (HCGP for respondent)

Mr. Sayyad Mohammad @ Nasim

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Enlargement of the petitioner on regular bail

Filing Reason

The petitioner sought bail after earlier rejection, with liberty to approach after receipt of FSL report

Previous Decisions

Earlier bail petition (Crl.P.No.3484/2022) rejected on 07.06.2022 with liberty to approach after FSL report

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC in a case involving commercial quantity of ganja under the NDPS Act? Whether the FSL report and long incarceration justify grant of bail?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner was in custody for 1 year 7 months, was not in conscious possession of the ganja found in the car's dicky, and was not connected to the larger seizure from the lorry. State opposed bail citing commercial quantity and presumption under Section 37 of NDPS Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the petitioner was not in conscious possession of the contraband found in the car's dicky, and the FSL report did not directly implicate him. The long incarceration of 1 year 7 months and the fact that the petitioner was not the owner of the vehicle weighed in favor of granting bail. The rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not attracted as the petitioner was not found to be in conscious possession.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a successive bail petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail of the petitioner/accused in Crime No.30/2021... This Court earlier rejected the bail petition of this petitioner in Crl.P.No.3484/2022 on 07.06.2022 and while rejecting the bail petition, liberty was given to the petitioner to approach this Court after receipt of FSL report. The accusation made against this petitioner is that he was also in the car in which 60 kilograms of ganja was transported and this petitioner is not connected with the seizure of 217.740 kilograms of ganja from the lorry.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a bail petition under Section 439 CrPC which was rejected on 07.06.2022 with liberty to approach after FSL report. Subsequently, the FSL report was received, and the petitioner filed the present successive bail petition on 11.01.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 439
  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c)
  • Arms Act, 1959: 4, 25(1B)(b)
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 201, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Holds Pending Civil Suits Not a Bar to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA: Quantum Park CHS v. AHCL-PEL & Ors
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Examines Quashing of Charges Under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC in Light of Suicide Note. Petitioners Argue Deceased’s Dying Declaration Absolves Them; Prosecution Argues Circumstantial Evidence of Dowry Harassment.