Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Teacher's Approval in Education Service Matter — Procedural Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Show Cause Notice Before Cancelling Approval of Appointment Renders Order Illegal and Unsustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: KOLHAPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Altaf Ahmed Rasool Saheb Jakler, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a letter dated 10th July 2024 issued by respondent No.2, the Deputy Director of Education, and the consequential order dated 15th July 2024 passed by the Administrative Officer, Municipal Corporation, Primary Education Board, Solapur, whereby the proposal for approval of the petitioner-employee was cancelled. The petitioner contended that the cancellation was done without issuing any show cause notice, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The court, after hearing the parties, observed that the impugned actions were taken without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The court held that such cancellation without a show cause notice is unsustainable in law. Consequently, the court quashed and set aside the letter dated 10th July 2024 and the order dated 15th July 2024. The court directed that the proposal for approval of the petitioner be reconsidered afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petition was disposed of accordingly. Rule was made absolute in those terms.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Education - Cancellation of Approval - Natural Justice - The petitioner's approval of appointment was cancelled by the Deputy Director of Education without any show cause notice - The court held that such cancellation without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice - The impugned letter and consequential order were quashed and set aside (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cancellation of the petitioner's approval of appointment without issuing a show cause notice is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned letter dated 10th July 2024 and consequential order dated 15th July 2024 are quashed and set aside. The proposal for approval of the petitioner shall be reconsidered afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Rule made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Show cause notice
  • Cancellation of approval
  • Education service
  • Appointment approval
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (05) 79

Writ Petition No. 12174 of 2024

2026-05-04

Madhav J. Jamdar, Pravin S. Patil

Mr. Prashant Bhavake for the Petitioner, Mr. I.M. Khairdi for the Applicant in IA, Mr. Lokesh Zade (through VC) for Respondent No.4, Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent - State

Altaf Ahmed Rasool Saheb Jakler

The State of Maharashtra, Through The Sec. School Education and Sports Dept. and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging cancellation of approval of appointment of an employee in education department.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of letter dated 10th July 2024 and consequential order dated 15th July 2024 cancelling the proposal for approval of the petitioner-employee.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's approval of appointment was cancelled without issuing any show cause notice, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of the petitioner's approval of appointment without a show cause notice is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the cancellation was done without any show cause notice, violating natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

Cancellation of approval of appointment without issuing a show cause notice is violative of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, challenge is to the letter dated 10th July 2024 issued by respondent No.2 – Deputy Director of Education and consequential order passed by the Administrative Officer, Municipal Corporation, Primary Education Board, Solapur, dated 15th July 2024 whereby the proposal of approval of the petitioner-employee was cancelled.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the cancellation of his approval of appointment. The court heard the parties and disposed of the petition on 4th May 2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes State Information Commission Order, Directs PIO to Provide RTI Information Free of Charge Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Timeframe Under Right to Information Act, 2005
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Teacher's Approval in Education Service Matter — Procedural Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Show Cause Notice Before Cancelling Approval of Appointment Renders Order Illegal and Unsustainab...