High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Passed Under Senior Citizens Act; Jurisdiction of Assistant Commissioner Under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Examined.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The instant writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by Smt. Soumya, the daughter-in-law of the first respondent Smt. Ratnakumari, challenging an order dated 17.06.2025 passed by the Assistant Commissioner and Authority for Senior Citizens Tribunal, Ballari, under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The impugned order directed the petitioner to vacate the premises occupied by her and her children and hand over vacant possession to the first respondent senior citizen. The first respondent had applied to the Assistant Commissioner on 15.04.2025 seeking eviction of the petitioner, who is her daughter-in-law, and cancellation of a gift deed executed in favour of the second respondent (another daughter-in-law) regarding a different house. The background involved the death of the first respondent's son, who was the petitioner's husband, after which relations between the petitioner and the first respondent became strained. The first respondent contended that the petitioner and her children had resided in Andhra Pradesh after her son's death eight years prior and that she was not residing in the premises. The petitioner argued that the Assistant Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to pass an eviction order under Section 23 of the Act. The respondents defended the order, asserting that the Assistant Commissioner possessed such power under the Act in certain circumstances. The court heard detailed submissions from both sides and reserved the matter for orders on 17.10.2025, later pronouncing judgment on 25.11.2025. The text of the judgment provided, however, does not contain the court's analysis, reasoning, or final decision; it only sets out the facts and arguments of counsel. Accordingly, the outcome and ratio decidendi are not discernible from the available excerpt.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned eviction order passed by the Assistant Commissioner under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 is without jurisdiction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (11) 51

WRIT PETITION No.104795 OF 2025 (GM – RES)

2025-11-25

M. Nagaprasanna

Srinivas Naik, Gayatri S.R., V.S. Kalasurmath

Smt. Soumya

Smt. Ratnakumari, Smt. Aruna, The Assistant Commissioner and Authority for Senior Citizens Tribunal Ballari

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an eviction order passed under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought quashing of the order dated 17.06.2025 passed by the Assistant Commissioner and Authority for Senior Citizens Tribunal, Ballari, directing her and her children to vacate the premises and hand over possession to the first respondent.

Filing Reason

The petitioner alleged that the Assistant Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to pass an eviction order under Section 23 of the Act.

Previous Decisions

The Assistant Commissioner on 17.06.2025 directed the petitioner to vacate the premises within 30 days and hand over vacant possession to the first respondent.

Issues

Whether the Assistant Commissioner under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 has jurisdiction to pass an eviction order.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Assistant Commissioner does not have jurisdiction to pass an eviction order under Section 23 of the Act. First respondent contended that after the death of the petitioner's husband, relations soured, the petitioner resided elsewhere, and the Assistant Commissioner has the authority to evict in certain circumstances. Government Advocate defended the order and sought dismissal of the petition.

Judgment Excerpts

the Assistant Commissioner directs the petitioner to vacate the house, which is in possession of the petitioner and her children and hand it over the same to the first respondent

Procedural History

The first respondent filed an application on 15.04.2025 before the Assistant Commissioner seeking eviction and cancellation of a gift deed. The Assistant Commissioner obtained a report and passed the impugned order on 17.06.2025 directing eviction within 30 days. The petitioner filed the instant writ petition challenging that order on the ground of lack of jurisdiction.

Acts & Sections

  • Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007: Section 23
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Passed Under Senior Citizens Act; Jurisdiction of Assistant Commissioner Under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Examined.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against DRAT Order Rejecting Additional Evidence Application on Technical Ground. Wrong Mention of Provision Does Not Oust Jurisdiction if Court Otherwise Has Power to Entertain Application.