High Court Dismisses Cooperative Society's Challenge to Deemed Membership of Legal Heir; Upholds Rights Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Unconditional withdrawal of prior title suit and society's inaction justified claim for deemed membership.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 59
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenged the Divisional Joint Registrar's order dated 13 November 2014 allowing respondent No.4's application for deemed membership in the petitioner cooperative society. The dispute concerned Flat No.31, Building No.4 of Malad Co-operative Housing Society. Late Ramlal Dhanuka, the father of respondent No.4, was a joint shareholder along with Pannadevi, wife of his son D.R. Dhanuka. Pannadevi filed a title suit in 2007 claiming exclusive ownership, but after her death, her legal heirs unconditionally withdrew the suit in 2012. Respondent No.4, as one of the legal heirs of late Ramlal Dhanuka, applied for membership, but the society failed to decide for nearly a year. He then approached the Deputy Registrar who rejected the application for non-production of title documents. On revision, the Divisional Joint Registrar allowed the application, noting that respondent No.4 was in possession, the suit was withdrawn, no objections from other heirs existed, and the society had not acted on the application. The society challenged this order, arguing that the application was under the wrong bye-law (transfer instead of transmission), proper procedure was not followed, and multiple heirs existed. The High Court dismissed the writ petition. The court held that the Joint Registrar's order was well-reasoned. The unconditional withdrawal of the suit removed any dispute over title. The society's failure to process the application and its acceptance of maintenance charges militated against its objections. The absence of objections from other legal heirs further supported the grant of membership. The court found no perversity in the revisional order and declined to interfere under its writ jurisdiction. Thus, the order granting deemed membership to respondent No.4 was upheld.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies - Membership - Transmission of Shares on Death - Bye-law 35, Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The applicant, a legal heir of a deceased member, sought deemed membership; the court found that the society's inaction and unconditional withdrawal of prior suit justified grant of membership; Held that Joint Registrar's order was proper (Paras 5-6, 8).

B) Cooperative Societies - Deemed Membership - Inaction by Society - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The society failed to respond to the membership application for nearly a year; Held that the Joint Registrar correctly declared deemed membership, and the society could not later raise procedural objections (Paras 5-6).

C) Civil Procedure - Unconditional Withdrawal of Suit - Effect - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order XXIII Rule 1 - A prior title suit was unconditionally withdrawn by legal heirs of a co-shareholder; Held that such withdrawal removed any cloud on the title of the original member's legal heirs (Para 5).

D) Cooperative Societies - Revisionary Powers - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The Divisional Joint Registrar set aside the Deputy Registrar's rejection order based on technical ground of non-production of title documents; Held that revisional authority correctly exercised powers to do substantive justice when applicant was in possession and no objection from other heirs (Para 8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Divisional Joint Registrar's order granting deemed membership to respondent No.4 was legal and proper, and whether the society could object on grounds of procedural non-compliance and existence of multiple heirs.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed; the order of Divisional Joint Registrar dated 13 November 2014 upheld; no interference warranted under writ jurisdiction.

Law Points

  • Legal points not extracted
  • deemed membership
  • transmission of shares on death
  • unconditional withdrawal of title suit
  • society's obligation to decide membership application
  • revision power under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1960
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (05) 172

Writ Petition No.1927 of 2015

2026-04-18

Amit Borkar, J.

Citation not available, 2026:BHC-AS:18204

S.U. Kamdar, Senior Advocate, Jeet Gandhi for petitioners; Sulbha Chipade, AGP for respondent Nos.1-3; Shrikrishna Ganbavale, Nikhil Sonar, Ashok Saraogi for respondent No.4

The Malad Co-operative Housing Society Limited and Nathmal Govindram Saraf

State of Maharashtra, The Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, The Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Radheshyam Ramlal Dhanuka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order granting deemed membership in cooperative society

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the Divisional Joint Registrar's order dated 13 November 2014 and restoration of Deputy Registrar's rejection order

Filing Reason

Society alleged procedural non-compliance, multiple heirs claiming rights, and application under wrong bye-law

Previous Decisions

Deputy Registrar rejected membership application on 11 July 2013; Divisional Joint Registrar set aside that order on 13 November 2014 and allowed membership

Issues

Whether the Divisional Joint Registrar's order granting deemed membership was legal and proper Whether the application for membership was under the correct bye-law (transmission vs transfer) Whether the society's failure to follow the mandatory procedure under Bye-law 35 vitiated the grant of membership Whether the unconditional withdrawal of the prior title suit extinguished any dispute over title Whether the revisional authority could override the society's procedural objections when no other heir objected

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that application was for transfer, not transmission, and Bye-law 35 procedure (public notice, indemnity bond) was not followed Petitioners contended that application was incomplete, lacking affidavit and original share certificate Respondent No.4 argued that as legal heir in possession and after unconditional withdrawal of suit, he was entitled to membership; society failed to act on his application for nearly a year Respondent No.4 contended that other legal heirs never objected and the society had accepted maintenance charges

Ratio Decidendi

Where a legal heir of a deceased member of a cooperative society is in possession of the flat, pays maintenance, and a prior title suit by a co-shareholder claiming exclusive ownership has been unconditionally withdrawn, and no other legal heirs object, the society cannot refuse membership on hyper-technical procedural grounds; the revisional authority may grant deemed membership to do complete justice.

Judgment Excerpts

the legal heirs of deceased Pannadevi Dhanuka, who had been substituted in her place, unconditionally withdrew the suit the petitioner society had failed to produce any objection from any legal heir of late Pannadevi Dhanuka or late Shri Ramlal Dhanuka

Procedural History

4 September 2013: Respondent No.4 filed Revision Application No.437 of 2013 before Divisional Joint Registrar; 13 November 2014: Divisional Joint Registrar allowed the revision and set aside Deputy Registrar's order dated 11 July 2013, granting deemed membership; 4 February 2015: Petitioner society filed writ petition challenging the Divisional Joint Registrar's order.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960:
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXIII Rule 1
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Cooperative Society's Challenge to Deemed Membership of Legal Heir; Upholds Rights Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Unconditional withdrawal of prior title suit and society's inaction justified claim for deemed ...
Related Judgement
High Court Writ Petition Seeking Quashing of Compulsory Retirement Order and Fresh Enquiry in Police Department Service Matter. The Petitioner Alleged Violation of Natural Justice in Departmental Enquiry Leading to Compulsory Retirement.