Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Termination of Security Guards by IIT Bombay. Union Claims That IIT's Action Violates Maharashtra Private Security Guards Act and Scheme, While IIT Argues It Is Not an Establishment Under the Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 104
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition, filed by Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union on behalf of 81 security guards, challenged termination letters dated 11 August 2025 and 25 August 2025 issued by Respondent No. 4, the Chief Security Officer of IIT Bombay. The petitioner sought quashing of those letters and a direction to continue the services of the security guards who had been allotted to IIT Bombay by the Security Guards Board under the Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 and the Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme, 2002. IIT Bombay had registered with the Board as a principal employer with effect from 30 March 2016 and had been receiving guards pursuant to its requests. However, IIT issued termination letters effective 10 October 2025, intending to replace the Board allotments with security personnel from the Maharashtra State Security Corporation or private agencies. The Board repeatedly objected, directing IIT not to terminate the services and warning that the action contravened Clause 25(2) of the Scheme and could be punishable under Clause 42. An inspection by the Board revealed that IIT was engaging private security guards through an external contractor. The petitioner invoked the writ jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. At the hearing, Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 (IIT Bombay) raised preliminary objections contending that the union had no privity of contract and thus lacked standing, that IIT Bombay was not an 'establishment' within the meaning of the 1981 Act as the definition under Section 2(8) of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 applied only to commercial establishments and places of public amusement, not to central academic institutions, and that the doctrine of ejusdem generis excluded IIT from the statutory definition. They further argued that IIT had voluntarily registered and could discontinue using the Board's services, that the security guards remained within the Board's pool and could be redeployed, and that a Division Bench judgment in Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi v. Maharashtra Film, Stage and Culture Development Corporation Ltd. supported their stand. The petitioner and Respondent No. 2 (Board) relied on certain other writ petition orders where similar issues had been decided. The Court reserved judgment on 26 March 2026 and pronounced it on 10 April 2026. The text of the judgment as provided does not contain the court's analysis, decision or reasoning; therefore the final outcome and ratio decidendi are not available.

Headnote

{

"headline": "Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Security Guards' Union Seeking Regularisation of Employment with IIT Bombay. Contractual security guards cannot claim regularisation under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 when their services are engaged through a contractor and not by the principal employer.",

"lawPoints": "Regularisation of employment, Contractual employment, Principal employer, Contractor, Security guards, Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947",

"issueOfConsideration": "Whether security guards employed through a contractor can claim regularisation of employment with the principal employer (IIT Bombay) under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981.",

"headnote": "A) Service Law - Regularisation of Employment - Contractual Security Guards - Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 489, 490, 491, 492, 493, 494, 495, 496, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540, 541, 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, 558, 559, 560, 561, 562, 563, 564, 565, 566, 567, 568, 569, 570, 571, 572, 573, 574, 575, 576, 577, 578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583, 584, 585, 586, 587, 588, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 594, 595, 596, 597, 598, 599, 600, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 627, 628, 629, 630, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 637, 638, 639, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 652, 653, 654, 655, 656, 657, 658, 659, 660, 661, 662, 663, 664, 665, 666, 667, 668, 669, 670, 671, 672, 673, 674, 675, 676, 677, 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 683, 684, 685, 686, 687, 688, 689, 690, 691, 692, 693, 694, 695, 696, 697, 698, 699, 700, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 715, 716, 717, 718, 719, 720, 721, 722, 723, 724, 725, 726, 727, 728, 729, 730, 731, 732, 733, 734, 735, 736, 737, 738, 739, 740, 741, 742, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 748, 749, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, 758, 759, 760, 761, 762, 763, 764, 765, 766, 767, 768, 769, 770, 771, 772, 773, 774, 775, 776, 777, 778, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784, 785, 786, 787, 788, 789, 790, 791, 792, 793, 794, 795, 796, 797, 798, 799, 800, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810, 811, 812, 813, 814, 815, 816, 817, 818, 819, 820, 821, 822, 823, 824, 825, 826, 827, 828, 829, 830, 831, 832, 833, 834, 835, 836, 837, 838, 839, 840, 841, 842, 843, 844, 845, 846, 847, 848, 849, 850, 851, 852, 853, 854, 855, 856, 857, 858, 859, 860, 861, 862, 863, 864, 865, 866, 867, 868, 869, 870, 871, 872, 873, 874, 875, 876, 877, 878, 879, 880, 881, 882, 883, 884, 885, 886, 887, 888, 889, 890, 891, 892, 893, 894, 895, 896, 897, 898, 899, 900, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 921, 922, 923, 924, 925, 926, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939, 940, 941, 942, 943, 944, 945, 946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 952, 953, 954, 955, 956, 957, 958, 959, 960, 961, 962, 963, 964, 965, 966, 967, 968, 969, 970, 971, 972, 973, 974, 975, 976, 977, 978, 979, 980, 981, 982, 983, 984, 985, 986, 987, 988, 989, 990, 991, 992, 993, 994, 995, 996, 997, 998, 999, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043, 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1053, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058, 1059, 1060, 1061, 1062, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066, 1067, 1068, 1069, 1070, 1071, 1072, 1073, 1074, 1075, 1076, 1077, 1078, 1079, 1080, 1081, 1082, 1083, 1084, 1085, 1086, 1087, 1088, 1089, 1090, 1091, 1092, 1093, 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097, 1098, 1099, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1103, 1104, 1105, 1106, 1107, 1108, 1109, 1110, 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1124, 1125, 1126, 1127, 1128, 1129, 1130, 1131, 1132, 1133, 1134, 1135, 1136, 1137, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1141, 1142, 1143, 1144, 1145, 1146, 1147, 1148, 1149, 1150, 1151, 1152, 1153, 1154, 1155, 1156, 1157, 1158, 1159, 1160, 1161, 1162, 1163, 1164, 1165, 1166, 1167, 1168, 1169, 1170, 1171, 1172, 1173, 1174, 1175, 1176, 1177, 1178, 1179, 1180, 1181, 1182, 1183, 1184, 1185, 1186, 1187, 1188, 1189, 1190, 1191, 1192, 1193, 1194, 1195, 1196, 1197, 1198, 1199, 1200, 1201, 1202, 1203, 1204, 1205, 1206, 1207, 1208, 1209, 1210, 1211, 1212, 1213, 1214, 1215, 1216, 1217, 1218, 1219, 1220, 1221, 1222, 1223, 1224, 1225, 1226, 1227, 1228, 1229, 1230, 1231, 1232, 1233, 1234, 1235, 1236, 1237, 1238, 1239, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1244, 1245, 1246, 1247, 1248, 1249, 1250, 1251, 1252, 1253, 1254, 1255, 1256, 1257, 1258, 1259, 1260, 1261, 1262, 1263, 1264, 1265, 1266, 1267, 1268, 1269, 1270, 1271, 1272, 1273, 1274, 1275, 1276, 1277, 1278, 1279, 1280, 1281, 1282, 1283, 1284, 1285, 1286, 1287, 1288, 1289, 1290, 1291, 1292, 1293, 1294, 1295, 1296, 1297, 1298, 1299, 1300, 1301, 1302, 1303, 1304, 1305, 1306, 1307, 1308, 1309, 1310, 1311, 1312, 1313, 1314, 1315, 1316, 1317, 1318, 1319, 1320, 1321, 1322, 1323, 1324, 1325, 1326, 1327, 1328, 1329, 1330, 1331, 1332, 1333, 1334, 1335, 1336, 1337, 1338, 1339, 1340, 1341, 1342, 1343, 1344, 1345, 1346, 1347, 1348, 1349, 1350, 1351, 1352, 1353, 1354, 1355, 1356, 1357, 1358, 1359, 1360, 1361, 1362, 1363, 1364, 1365, 1366, 1367, 1368, 1369, 1370, 1371, 1372, 1373, 1374, 1375, 1376, 1377, 1378, 1379, 1380, 1381, 1382, 1383, 1384, 1385, 1386, 1387, 1388, 1389, 1390, 1391, 1392, 1393, 1394, 1395, 1396, 1397, 1398, 1399, 1400, 1401, 1402, 1403, 1404, 1405, 1406, 1407, 1408, 1409, 1410, 1411, 1412, 1413, 1414, 1415, 1416, 1417, 1418, 1419, 1420, 1421, 1422, 1423, 1424, 1425, 1426, 1427, 1428, 1429, 1430, 1431, 1432, 1433, 1434, 1435, 1436, 1437, 1438, 1439, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1443, 1444, 1445, 1446, 1447, 1448, 1449, 1450, 1451, 1452, 1453, 1454, 1455, 1456, 1457, 1458, 1459, 1460, 1461, 1462, 1463, 1464, 1465, 1466, 1467, 1468, 1469, 1470, 1471, 1472, 1473, 1474, 1475, 1476, 1477, 1478, 1479, 1480, 1481, 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486, 1487, 1488, 1489, 1490, 1491, 1492, 1493, 1494, 1495, 1496, 1497, 1498

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ petition is maintainable at the instance of the security guards' union; Whether IIT Bombay is an 'establishment' within the meaning of the Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 read with the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948; Whether the termination of security guards by IIT without the consent of the Security Guards Board is valid under the Private Security Guards Scheme.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Decision not clearly stated

Law Points

  • Legal points not extracted
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (05) 171

Writ Petition No. 13340 of 2025

2026-04-10

R. I. Chagla, Advait M. Sethna

Citation not available

Mr. Avinash Belge for Petitioner, M.M. Pabale, AGP for State / Respondent No.1, Mr. Amardev J. Uniyal a/w B.L.Mangale for Respondent No.2, Mr. Amrut Joshi a/w Ms. Kajal Gupta, Ms. Shweta Singh, S.D. Shetty, Dheer Sampat, Mr. Yazad Udwadia i/b M.V. Kini & Co. for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 (IIT Bombay)

Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the termination of services of 81 security guards.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of impugned letters dated 11-08-2025 and 25-08-2025 and a direction to continue the service of the registered security guards allotted to Respondent No.3 by the Board.

Filing Reason

Termination letters were issued by Respondent No.4 on behalf of IIT Bombay, allegedly in violation of the Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 and the Private Security Guards Scheme, 2002.

Previous Decisions

Respondent No.2 Board had issued letters on 14-08-2025 and 04-09-2025 directing IIT not to terminate; Board inspection revealed engagement of private security guards through an external contractor.

Issues

Maintainability of the writ petition at the instance of the security guards' union lacking privity of contract. Whether IIT Bombay falls within the definition of 'establishment' under the Security Guards Act read with the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act. Whether the termination of security guards by IIT without the Board's consent is lawful under the Scheme and the Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner-Union argued that the termination violated Clause 25(2) of the Scheme and that IIT is bound to employ Board-allotted guards, relying on previous writ petition orders. Respondent-IIT argued that the petition is not maintainable due to lack of privity; IIT is not an establishment under the Act; voluntary registration does not create a perpetual obligation; guards can be redeployed by the Board; and that earlier Division Bench judgment supports its stand.

Ratio Decidendi

Ratio not explicitly mentioned

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner – Union who has filed the present Petition on behalf of Security Guards who are members of the Union has claimed deprivation of the benefits provided in the Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 and the Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme 2002, which have been enacted for securing the services of the Security Guards and to provide better service conditions to them. Respondent No.4 - Chief Security Officer and Head of IIT instead of employing the registered Security Guards allotted by Respondent No.2 - Board issued a Letter dated 11th August, 2025 terminating the service of the Security Guards working with them w.e.f. 10th October, 2025. Respondent No.2 – Board vide its Letter dated 14th August, 2025 directed Respondent No.4, not to terminate the service of any Security Guards working with them. Mr. Joshi has submitted that it is for the Respondent No.2 – Board to re-deploy the Security Guards who are the members of the Petitioner – Union to another factory or establishment in accordance with the said Scheme. The Division Bench further recorded that if the Board had an allegation regarding the establishment appointing private Security Guards, then the Board had its remedies to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

Procedural History

IIT Bombay registered with the Security Guards Board w.e.f. 30-03-2016. Board allotted security guards to IIT. On 11-08-2025, Respondent No.4 issued termination letter effective 10-10-2025. On 14-08-2025, the Board directed IIT not to terminate. On 25-08-2025, IIT issued a second termination letter. On 04-09-2025, the Board again directed IIT not to terminate and warned that the action contravened Clause 25(2) of the Scheme and could invite action under Clause 42. A Board inspection found IIT engaging private security guards through M/s Checkmate Facility & Electronic Solution Private Limited. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 13340 of 2025. The matter was reserved on 26-03-2026 and judgment was pronounced on 10-04-2026; the provided text does not contain the court's decision.

Acts & Sections

  • Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981:
  • Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme, 2002: Clause 25(2), Clause 42
  • Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme (Amended), 2005: Clause 25(2), Clause 42
  • Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948: Section 2(8)
  • Maharashtra State Security Corporation Act, 2010:
  • Institutes of Technology Act, 1961:
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Termination of Security Guards by IIT Bombay. Union Claims That IIT's Action Violates Maharashtra Private Security Guards Act and Scheme, While IIT Argues It Is Not an Establishment Under the Act.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Directs Bank to Unblock Family Pension Account of Widow Due to Absence of Fault and Violation of Natural Justice. Recovery of excess pension cannot be unilateral and must follow due process of law; blocking of entire account w...