Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition for Pay Scale Revision Due to Delay and Laches. Work Charge Operator's Claim for Pay Scale of Rs. 1200-1800 from 1987 Rejected as Petition Filed in 2023 Without Explanation.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Kalubhai Mohanbhai Raval, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Court seeking a direction to the respondents (State of Gujarat and others) to grant him the pay scale of Rs. 1200-1800 with effect from 18.06.1987, and on that basis, revise his pay as per the 5th and 6th Pay Commissions with consequential benefits. The petitioner claimed that he was appointed as a Daily Wager on 22.10.1974, though the respondents disputed this due to lack of records. However, it was undisputed that he was employed as a Work Charge Helper from 15.12.1984 in the pay scale of Rs. 210-270, and later promoted to Work Charge Operator. The petitioner contended that he was entitled to the higher pay scale from the date he started working as a heavy machine operator. The respondents opposed the petition primarily on the ground of delay and laches, arguing that the claim was made after more than 36 years without any explanation. The court noted that the petitioner sought the pay scale from 18.06.1987 but filed the petition in 2023, and no justification was offered for the inordinate delay. The court held that the claim was stale and that the writ court, in its discretionary jurisdiction, could not entertain such a belated claim. The petition was dismissed on the ground of delay and laches, without examining the merits of the pay scale entitlement.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pay Scale Revision - Delay and Laches - Petitioner, a work charge operator, claimed pay scale of Rs. 1200-1800 from 18.06.1987 but filed petition in 2023 - No explanation for delay of over 36 years - Held that claim is stale and cannot be entertained due to inordinate delay and laches (Paras 7-10).

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India - Discretionary relief - Court refused to exercise discretion in favor of petitioner due to unexplained delay - Held that writ court may decline relief if there is gross delay (Para 10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to the pay scale of Rs. 1200-1800 w.e.f. 18.06.1987 and consequential revision under 5th and 6th Pay Commissions, and whether the petition is barred by delay and laches.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Delay and laches
  • Pay scale revision
  • Work charge employee
  • Daily wager
  • Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:4335

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19213 of 2023

2026-01-16

Bhargav D. Karia

2026:GUJHC:4335

Mr. J. A. Adeshra for the petitioner, Ms. Shruti Dhruve, AGP for the respondents

Kalubhai Mohanbhai Raval

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking pay scale revision and consequential benefits.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to respondents to grant pay scale of Rs. 1200-1800 w.e.f. 18.06.1987 and revision as per 5th and 6th Pay Commissions with difference in salary and consequential benefits.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed entitlement to higher pay scale as heavy machine operator from 1987 but was not granted the same.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to the pay scale of Rs. 1200-1800 w.e.f. 18.06.1987? Whether the petition is barred by delay and laches?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he was appointed as Daily Wager on 22.10.1974 and later promoted to Work Charge Operator, and is entitled to pay scale of Rs. 1200-1800 from 18.06.1987. Respondents contended that the claim is highly belated, filed after 36 years without any explanation, and therefore liable to be dismissed on ground of delay and laches.

Ratio Decidendi

A writ court may decline to entertain a claim if there is inordinate and unexplained delay, as the discretionary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 is not meant to revive stale claims.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner seeks the pay scale of Rs. 1200-1800 w.e.f. 18.06.1987 and the petition is filed in the year 2023 i.e. after a period of more than 36 years. No explanation is coming forward from the petitioner as to why the petitioner kept quiet for such a long period. The claim of the petitioner is therefore stale and cannot be entertained by this Court in exercise of powers under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

Procedural History

Petition filed in 2023; notice issued on 06.11.2023; respondents filed affidavit affirmed on 11.04.2025; matter heard on 16.01.2026 and dismissed.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity and House Trespass Case Due to Unreliable Identification. Identification by torchlight in darkness held insufficient to sustain conviction under Sections 452 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition for Pay Scale Revision Due to Delay and Laches. Work Charge Operator's Claim for Pay Scale of Rs. 1200-1800 from 1987 Rejected as Petition Filed in 2023 Without Explanation.