High Court of Gujarat Allows Insurance Appeals in Motor Accident Case — Apportionment of 50% Liability on Bus Driver Set Aside. Truck Parked Unattended Without Signals on Service Road at Night Held Solely Negligent Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 66
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident on 12.06.2015, where a luxury bus (GJ-10-W-9585) collided with a stationary truck (GJ-23-V-2544) parked on a service road at around 03:30 hours without any signals or precautionary measures. The deceased was a passenger in the bus and sustained fatal injuries. The claimants filed MAC Petition No.972/2015 seeking compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rajkot, partly allowed the claim petitions and apportioned 50% liability on the driver of the luxury bus and 50% on the driver of the truck. Aggrieved, the insurance companies (The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and United India Insurance Co. Ltd.) filed appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The appellants argued that the Tribunal erred in holding the bus driver equally liable, contending that the truck was parked unattended on the service road without any signals, and the bus driver could not have anticipated such obstruction. The court heard Mr. Rathin P. Raval for The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Mr. Vibhuti Nanavaty for United India Insurance Co. Ltd. The claimants' counsel remained absent. The court perused the original record and proceedings. The court held that the truck driver was solely negligent for parking the vehicle without any signals or precautions on a service road at night, and the bus driver could not be expected to anticipate such an obstruction. Consequently, the court allowed the appeals, set aside the Tribunal's finding of 50% liability on the bus driver, and held the truck driver solely liable for the accident. The court directed that the insurance company of the truck (United India Insurance Co. Ltd.) shall pay the entire compensation amount, with the bus insurer (The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.) being exonerated from liability.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Contributory Negligence - Apportionment of Liability - Section 173 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The court considered whether the Tribunal correctly apportioned 50% liability on the bus driver when the truck was parked unattended without signals on a service road at night - Held that the truck driver was solely negligent for parking without precautions, and the bus driver could not be expected to anticipate such obstruction - The appeal was allowed, setting aside the 50% liability on the bus driver (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal erred in apportioning 50% liability on the driver of the luxury bus when the accident occurred due to a stationary truck parked unattended without signals on a service road at night.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeals are allowed. The common judgment and award dated 23.11.2021 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rajkot, is modified to the extent that the driver of the truck is held solely negligent for the accident. The insurance company of the truck (United India Insurance Co. Ltd.) shall pay the entire compensation amount. The insurance company of the bus (The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.) is exonerated from liability.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Apportionment of liability
  • Negligence of parked vehicle
  • Duty of care
  • Section 173 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (01) 712

R/First Appeal No. 1085 of 2022 with R/First Appeal No. 1340 of 2022

2026-01-07

Hasmukh D. Suthar

2026:GUJHC:2077

Mr. Rathin P. Raval for Appellant in FA/1085/2022, Mr. Vibhuti Nanavati for Appellant in FA/1340/2022, Mr. Hemal Shah for Respondents 1-4

The New India Assurance Company Limited (in FA/1085/2022) and United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (in FA/1340/2022)

Bhavnaben Mehulbhai Jani (Wife of Deceased) & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against common judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in claim petitions arising from a fatal motor accident.

Remedy Sought

The appellant insurance companies sought to set aside the Tribunal's finding of 50% liability on the bus driver and to hold the truck driver solely negligent.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal apportioned 50% liability on the bus driver, which the insurance companies contended was erroneous as the truck was parked unattended without signals.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rajkot, partly allowed the claim petitions and apportioned 50% liability on the bus driver and 50% on the truck driver.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in apportioning 50% liability on the driver of the luxury bus when the accident occurred due to a stationary truck parked unattended without signals on a service road at night.

Submissions/Arguments

Mr. Rathin Raval for The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. submitted that the Tribunal erred in saddling the insurance company with 50% liability; the accident occurred due to the sole negligence of the stationary truck parked on the service road without signals or precautions at night, and there was no negligence on the part of the luxury bus.

Ratio Decidendi

When a vehicle is parked unattended on a service road at night without any signals or precautionary measures, the driver of that vehicle is solely negligent for any collision, and the driver of a moving vehicle cannot be expected to anticipate such an obstruction. Therefore, apportionment of liability on the moving vehicle driver is erroneous.

Judgment Excerpts

the Tribunal committed a grave error in saddling the insurance company with 50% liability. the truck was lying unattended without any signals or other precautionary measures at about 03:30 hours during the night. There was no negligence on the part of the luxury bus.

Procedural History

The claimants filed MAC Petition No.972/2015 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rajkot, which partly allowed the claim petitions on 23.11.2021, apportioning 50% liability on the bus driver and 50% on the truck driver. Aggrieved, the insurance companies filed First Appeal No.1085/2022 (by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.) and First Appeal No.1340/2022 (by United India Insurance Co. Ltd.) before the High Court of Gujarat under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The High Court heard the appeals together and delivered a common judgment on 07.01.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 173
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Act Cases Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent and Procedural Lapses. Court held that mere registration of FIR under SC/ST Act does not bar anticipatory bail if no prima facie case of intentional insul...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Metro Centre Project. Claimant's Appeal Partly Allowed; State's Appeal Dismissed.