NCLAT Partially Allows Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration, Holds SEBI Penalty as Excluded Debt Under IBC. Personal Guarantor's Bankruptcy Petition Admitted but SEBI Penalty Excluded from Discharge as 'Fine' Under Section 79(15)(a) of IBC.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 76
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Ms. G.V. Marry, was a personal guarantor to BRG Energy Ltd., a company incorporated in 2006 under the Companies Act, 1956. She filed an application under Section 122(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Rule 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Bankruptcy Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtor) Rules, 2019, seeking bankruptcy after the failure of the personal insolvency process. The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT Hyderabad) admitted the application and declared her bankrupt under Section 126 of the IBC, but observed that a penalty imposed by SEBI on the appellant, being pecuniary in nature, would come within the meaning of 'fine' under Section 79(15)(a) of the IBC and thus be treated as 'excluded debt' outside the scope of bankruptcy proceedings. Aggrieved by this observation, the appellant appealed to the NCLAT. The NCLAT examined the definition of 'excluded debt' under Section 79(15)(a), which includes 'fine' imposed by a court or tribunal. The Tribunal noted that SEBI is a statutory authority empowered to impose penalties for violations of securities laws, and such penalties are akin to fines. The NCLAT held that the SEBI penalty is a 'fine' within the meaning of Section 79(15)(a) and therefore an excluded debt not dischargeable in bankruptcy. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the impugned order to the extent that the SEBI penalty is excluded from the bankruptcy proceedings, while the rest of the order declaring the appellant bankrupt was upheld.

Headnote

A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Excluded Debt - Section 79(15)(a) - Fine - SEBI Penalty - The issue was whether a penalty imposed by SEBI on a personal guarantor is a 'fine' under Section 79(15)(a) of the IBC, 2016, and thus an 'excluded debt' not dischargeable in bankruptcy. The NCLAT held that the SEBI penalty, being pecuniary in nature and imposed for violation of securities laws, falls within the meaning of 'fine' under Section 79(15)(a) and is excluded from the bankruptcy discharge. (Paras 1-14)

B) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Bankruptcy of Personal Guarantor - Section 122(1) - Application for Bankruptcy - The appellant, a personal guarantor to BRG Energy Ltd., filed an application under Section 122(1) of the IBC, 2016, for bankruptcy after failure of the personal insolvency process. The NCLAT upheld the admission of the bankruptcy petition but modified the order to exclude the SEBI penalty from the bankruptcy proceedings. (Paras 2-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a penalty imposed by SEBI on a personal guarantor constitutes a 'fine' under Section 79(15)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and thus is an 'excluded debt' not dischargeable in bankruptcy proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The impugned order of NCLT Hyderabad dated 23.01.2025 is modified to the extent that the SEBI penalty is held to be an 'excluded debt' under Section 79(15)(a) of the IBC, 2016, and is outside the scope of bankruptcy proceedings. The rest of the order declaring the appellant bankrupt is upheld.

Law Points

  • Bankruptcy
  • Personal Guarantor
  • Excluded Debt
  • Fine
  • SEBI Penalty
  • Section 79(15)(a) IBC
  • Section 122(1) IBC
  • Section 126 IBC
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (NCLAT) (01) 71

Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 165/2025

0000-00-00

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma (Member (Judicial))

Mr. M.L. Joseph (for Appellant), Mr. Rahul Unnikrishnan (for Respondent No. 3)

Ms. G.V. Marry

Union Bank of India, Shriram Finance Limited, Securities and Exchange Board of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order of NCLT Hyderabad declaring the appellant bankrupt under Section 126 of IBC, 2016, with an observation that a SEBI penalty is an 'excluded debt' under Section 79(15)(a).

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to challenge the observation that the SEBI penalty is an excluded debt, seeking its inclusion in the bankruptcy discharge.

Filing Reason

The appellant, a personal guarantor, filed for bankruptcy under Section 122(1) of IBC after failure of personal insolvency process. The NCLT admitted the petition but excluded the SEBI penalty from bankruptcy, which the appellant contested.

Previous Decisions

NCLT Hyderabad order dated 23.01.2025 in CP(IB)No. 214/122/HDB/2022 admitted the bankruptcy petition and declared the appellant bankrupt under Section 126, but held that the SEBI penalty is an 'excluded debt' under Section 79(15)(a).

Issues

Whether a penalty imposed by SEBI on a personal guarantor constitutes a 'fine' under Section 79(15)(a) of the IBC, 2016, and thus is an 'excluded debt' not dischargeable in bankruptcy proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the SEBI penalty should not be treated as an 'excluded debt' and should be dischargeable in bankruptcy. The respondent (SEBI) argued that the penalty is a 'fine' under Section 79(15)(a) and thus excluded from bankruptcy.

Ratio Decidendi

A penalty imposed by SEBI, being pecuniary in nature and imposed for violation of securities laws, falls within the meaning of 'fine' under Section 79(15)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and is therefore an 'excluded debt' not dischargeable in bankruptcy proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

the penalty imposed by SEBI, being pecuniary in nature, will come within the meaning of ‘Fine’ and will be treated as ‘excluded debt’ under Section 79(15)(a) of the I & B Code, 2016, and thus outside the scope of Bankruptcy proceedings. The Appellant has filed this appeal aggrieved by the above observation.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an application under Section 122(1) of IBC, 2016, before NCLT Hyderabad, which was admitted on 23.01.2025 in CP(IB)No. 214/122/HDB/2022. The NCLT declared the appellant bankrupt under Section 126 but held that a SEBI penalty is an excluded debt. The appellant appealed to NCLAT against this observation.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: 79(15)(a), 122(1), 126
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Bankruptcy Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtor) Rules, 2019: Rule 6
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder in Lodge Room Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing his wife in a lodge room confirmed as chain of circumstances including ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Second Round of Arbitration — No Arbitration Agreement Survives After Award Set Aside Without Remand. The court held that after an arbitral award is set aside under...