The Petitioner challenged the Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating his caste claim as belonging to 'Koli Mahadev, Scheduled Tribe' -- The Petitioner's father held a valid caste validity certificate issued in 2007 -- The Scrutiny Committee discarded this certificate citing discrepancies in entries considered by the earlier committee -- The High Court found this reasoning unjustifiable and held that the Petitioner's claim should be accepted based on his father's valid certificate -- The Court quashed the impugned order and directed issuance of caste validity certificate to the Petitioner within 6 weeks -- The Court clarified that if the father's certificate is later cancelled, similar consequences would follow for the Petitioner's certificate
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed a Writ Petition challenging the Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the Petitioner's caste claim -- The Court held that the Petitioner's claim based on his father's caste validity certificate should have been accepted -- The Scrutiny Committee's reason for discarding the father's certificate was unjustifiable -- The Court quashed the impugned order and directed issuance of caste validity certificate to the Petitioner -- The Court cited Apoorva d/o Vinay Nichale Vs. Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee No. 1 and others (2010) and Maharashtra Adiwasi Thakur Jamat Swarakshan Samiti Vs. State of Maharashtra and others (2023) -- The judgment established that when a close blood relative holds a valid caste certificate, the claimant's case should be accepted unless fraud or procedural defects are established
The High Court allowed the Writ Petition -- The impugned order was quashed and set aside -- The Scrutiny Committee was directed to issue caste validity certificate to Petitioner within 6 weeks -- The Court held that Petitioner's claim should be accepted based on father's valid certificate
Citation: 2026 LawText (BOM) (01) 74
Case Number: Writ Petition No. 11071 of 2023
Date of Decision: 2026-01-19
Case Title: Whether the Scrutiny Committee was justified in invalidating the Petitioner's caste claim as belonging to 'Koli Mahadev, Scheduled Tribe' despite his father holding a valid caste validity certificate
Before Judge: M.S. Karnik J. , S.M. Modak J.
Equivalent Citations: 2026:BHC-AS:2427-DB
Advocate(s): Mr. R.K. Mendadkar a/w Adv. Prajakta Pashte for Petitioner, Ms. Rupali Shinde, AGP for Respondents
Appellant: Bhushan Rajendra More
Respondent: State of Maharashtra and anr.
Nature of Litigation: Writ Petition challenging administrative order invalidating caste claim
Remedy Sought: Petitioner sought quashing of Scrutiny Committee's order and issuance of caste validity certificate
Filing Reason: Scrutiny Committee invalidated Petitioner's caste claim despite his father holding valid caste validity certificate
Previous Decisions: Scrutiny Committee invalidated Petitioner's caste claim -- Petitioner's father was issued caste validity certificate on 31/08/2007
Issues: Whether the Scrutiny Committee was justified in invalidating the Petitioner's caste claim based on his father's caste validity certificate Whether discrepancies in entries considered by earlier committee justify discarding valid caste certificate
Submissions/Arguments: Petitioner argued that Scrutiny Committee unjustifiably discarded father's valid caste validity certificate -- Respondent argued that Committee had cogent reasons for invalidation based on discrepancies in earlier entries
Ratio Decidendi: When a claimant establishes blood relationship with a person holding valid caste validity certificate, and the certificate was issued after due enquiry without fraud, the claimant's caste claim should be accepted -- Scrutiny Committee cannot discard valid certificates based on alleged discrepancies in earlier proceedings without proper cancellation process
Judgment Excerpts: "We have considered the matter and we are of the view that the petitioner's caste claim...ought to have been accepted by the Committee merely on the basis that identical caste claim of her sister...has been allowed by the Committee" -- Para 3 "(i) The applicant must establish a clear and specific relationship with the person in whose favour the validity certificate has been issued; (ii) The Scrutiny Committee must verify whether the validity certificate was granted to the applicant's blood relative after due enquiry and in accordance with prescribed procedure; and (iii) The Scrutiny Committee must ascertain the genuineness of the validity certificate relied upon" -- Para 4 "In our opinion, this could not have been a justifiable reason to invalidate the caste claim" -- Para 5
Procedural History: Petitioner filed caste claim with Scrutiny Committee -- Scrutiny Committee invalidated the claim -- Petitioner filed Writ Petition challenging the invalidation -- High Court heard arguments from both sides -- High Court examined impugned order and affidavit in reply -- High Court allowed the Petition and directed issuance of certificate
