Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Dispute Arises from Contract for Construction Works at INS Hamla, and Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 61
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, M/s. Shanti Enterprises, a partnership firm engaged in construction, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the Union of India for appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising out of Contract Agreement No. C.A. No. CENM M-13 of 2011-12 for addition/alteration and improvement to Building P/151 at INS Hamla. The respondent had invited tenders, and the applicant was declared the successful bidder. A letter of acceptance dated 20th October 2011 was issued, followed by a work order with commencement on 9th November 2011 and completion by 9th November 2012. The total contract value was Rs.53,65,623/-. The contract was governed by General Conditions of the Contract (GCC), and Condition 70 contained the arbitration agreement. Disputes arose between the parties, and the applicant invoked the arbitration clause. The respondent did not appoint an arbitrator, leading to the present application. The court examined the arbitration clause and found that an arbitration agreement existed. The court allowed the application and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes. The judgment does not detail the specific disputes or arguments of the parties beyond the existence of the arbitration agreement.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Existence of Arbitration Agreement - The applicant sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Act for disputes arising from a construction contract with the Union of India. The contract contained Condition 70 providing for arbitration. The court found that an arbitration agreement existed and appointed an arbitrator. Held that the application under Section 11 is maintainable and the arbitrator is appointed. (Paras 1-11)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising out of a contract containing an arbitration clause (Condition 70 of GCC).

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

Law Points

  • Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Appointment of Arbitrator
  • Existence of Arbitration Agreement
  • General Conditions of Contract
  • Condition 70
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (12) 37

Arbitration Application No. 89 of 2015

2016-12-22

S.J. Kathawalla

Mr. Y. Singh i/b. Auris Legal for the Applicant, Mr. Y. Bhate i/b. Ms. Anamika Malhotra for the Respondent

M/s. Shanti Enterprises

Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising out of a construction contract.

Remedy Sought

Appointment of a sole arbitrator by the court to adjudicate disputes between the applicant and the respondent.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose between the parties under the contract, and the respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator despite the arbitration clause.

Issues

Whether an arbitration agreement exists between the parties. Whether the court should appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that an arbitration agreement existed between the parties as per Condition 70 of the General Conditions of the Contract, and therefore, the application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator is maintainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The above Arbitration Application is filed by the Applicant - M/s. Shanti Enterprises against the Respondent - Union of India under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising out of the Contract Agreement No. C.A. No. CENM M-13 of 2011-12 'For Addition / Alteration and Improvement to Building P / 151 ( Junior Sailors Bock 320 )at INS HAMLA.' Condition 70 pertains to arbitration agreement.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Arbitration Application No. 89 of 2015 under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator. The court heard the application and passed judgment on 22nd December 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11
  • Indian Partnership Act, 1932:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Declares Plaintiff Owner of Copyright in Drawings Developed Under Contract for Valuable Consideration. Payment of Rs.2,87,500/- for Development of Drug Powder Inhaler Transfers Copyright Ownership Under Section 17 of Copyright Act, ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Public Servants in Corruption Cases for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 PC Act — Proceedings Initiated Without Valid Sanction Are Void Ab Initio.