Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order in Service Law — Transfer Order Quashed for Non-Compliance with Government Resolution Requiring Minimum Tenure. Petitioner's Transfer Before Completion of Two-Year Tenure Violated Government Resolution Dated 15-06-2013, Which Mandates Minimum Two-Year Posting Unless Exceptional Circumstances Exist.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 133
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ashok S/o Bhika Hirole, was serving as a Health Worker at the Primary Health Centre, Kurha, Taluka Muktainagar, District Jalgaon. He filed a writ petition challenging his transfer order dated 30-06-2015, which transferred him from Kurha to another place. The petitioner contended that he had not completed two years at his present place of posting and that the transfer was in violation of the Government Resolution dated 15-06-2013, which prescribes a minimum tenure of two years for employees unless there are exceptional circumstances. The respondents argued that the transfer was made in the public interest and that the petitioner had no right to a particular posting. The court examined the Government Resolution and found that it clearly mandates a minimum tenure of two years. The transfer order did not record any exceptional circumstances justifying the premature transfer. The court held that the transfer order was arbitrary and quashed it. The court directed the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue at his present place of posting until he completes two years there or until further orders in accordance with law. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Minimum Tenure - Government Resolution dated 15-06-2013 - The petitioner, a Health Worker, was transferred before completing two years at his posting, contrary to the Government Resolution which mandates a minimum tenure of two years unless exceptional circumstances exist. The court held that the transfer order was arbitrary and quashed it, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue at his present place of posting until completion of two years or until further orders in accordance with law. (Paras 1-8)

B) Service Law - Transfer - Judicial Review - Interference with Transfer Orders - The court reiterated that transfer orders can be interfered with if they violate statutory rules or government resolutions. In this case, the transfer order was set aside as it did not record any exceptional circumstances justifying the premature transfer. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer order of the petitioner, who had not completed two years at the present place of posting, is valid in light of the Government Resolution dated 15-06-2013 which prescribes a minimum tenure of two years.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned transfer order dated 30-06-2015 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to continue at his present place of posting i.e. Primary Health Centre, Kurha, Taluka Muktainagar, District Jalgaon, until he completes two years there or until further orders in accordance with law. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Transfer order must comply with government resolution prescribing minimum tenure
  • Transfer order without recording reasons for exceptional circumstances is arbitrary
  • Government Resolution dated 15-06-2013 mandates minimum two-year posting
  • Transfer order can be interfered with if it violates statutory rules or government resolutions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (08) 3

Writ Petition No. 11799 of 2015

2016-08-01

S.S. Shinde, Sangitrao S. Patil

Mr. H.P. Kshirsagar for the petitioner, Mrs. M.A. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, Ms. C.R. Chaudhary (Kutti) for Respondent No.4

Ashok S/o Bhika Hirole

The State of Maharashtra, The Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik, The District Collector, Jalgaon, Through its Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, The District Health Officer, Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a transfer order in service law.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of transfer order dated 30-06-2015 and direction to allow the petitioner to continue at his present place of posting.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was transferred before completing two years at his posting, allegedly in violation of Government Resolution dated 15-06-2013.

Issues

Whether the transfer order of the petitioner, who had not completed two years at the present place of posting, is valid in light of the Government Resolution dated 15-06-2013 which prescribes a minimum tenure of two years.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the transfer order violated Government Resolution dated 15-06-2013 which mandates a minimum tenure of two years. Respondents argued that the transfer was in public interest and the petitioner has no right to a particular posting.

Ratio Decidendi

A transfer order that violates a government resolution prescribing a minimum tenure is arbitrary and liable to be quashed. The government resolution dated 15-06-2013 mandates a minimum tenure of two years unless exceptional circumstances exist, and the transfer order did not record any such circumstances.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Petitioner is serving as a Health Worker at Primary Health Centre, Kurha, Taluka Muktainagar, District Jalgaon. The transfer order dated 30-06-2015 is challenged on the ground that it violates Government Resolution dated 15-06-2013 which prescribes a minimum tenure of two years. The Government Resolution dated 15-06-2013 clearly mandates a minimum tenure of two years. The transfer order does not record any exceptional circumstances. The transfer order is arbitrary and is quashed. Respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to continue at his present place of posting until he completes two years there or until further orders.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 11799 of 2015 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad challenging the transfer order dated 30-06-2015. The petition was heard on 15th July 2016 and judgment was pronounced on 1st August 2016.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order in Service Law — Transfer Order Quashed for Non-Compliance with Government Resolution Requiring Minimum Tenure. Petitioner's Transfer Before Completion of Two-Year Tenure Violated Go...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Breach of Policy Conditions Not Proved by Insurance Company. Claimants entitled to compensation as insurer failed to establish that vehicle was used for commercial purpose in violati...