Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Claim of Married Daughter Against Municipal Corporation's Ineligibility Declaration. Marriage of a daughter does not disentitle her from compassionate appointment under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, as the scheme does not impose any bar based on marital status.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 162
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vijaya Ukarda Athor, daughter of late Ukarda Athor, a clerk in Amravati Municipal Corporation, challenged the order dated 18-09-2012 passed by the Municipal Corporation appointing respondent no.3 (her half-brother) and declaring her ineligible for compassionate appointment on the ground that she had married. Ukarda died on 18-06-1997, leaving behind two wives: Shantabai (petitioner's mother) and Kuntabai (respondent no.3's mother). The petitioner applied for compassionate appointment on 19-03-1998 after attaining majority, while respondent no.3 applied later on 25-05-2009. The petitioner objected to respondent no.3's appointment on 19-04-2012. The Corporation passed the impugned order appointing respondent no.3 and rejecting the petitioner's claim due to her marriage. The court examined the scheme for compassionate appointment under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, and found no provision barring a married daughter. The court held that the marriage of a daughter does not disqualify her from compassionate appointment. The petition was allowed, the impugned order was quashed, and the Corporation was directed to consider the petitioner's application afresh without reference to her marital status.

Headnote

A) Compassionate Appointment - Eligibility - Marriage Bar - Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - The court considered whether marriage of a daughter renders her ineligible for compassionate appointment. The court held that the scheme for compassionate appointment does not contain any provision disqualifying a married daughter. The impugned order declaring the petitioner ineligible solely on the ground of marriage was set aside. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a married daughter is ineligible for compassionate appointment under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, and the relevant scheme.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 18-09-2012 is quashed and set aside. The respondent no.2 Municipal Corporation is directed to consider the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment afresh without reference to her marital status.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • marriage bar
  • eligibility criteria
  • daughter's right
  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act
  • 1949
  • scheme interpretation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (07) 122

Writ Petition No.1341 of 2013

2016-07-20

B.P. Dharmadhikari, Kum. I.K. Jain

Mr. G.D. Asole for petitioner, Mr. J.B. Kasat for resp. no.2, Mr. N.S. Autkar for resp. no.3, Mr. S.B. Bissa, AGP for State

Vijaya Ukarda Athor (Athawale)

State of Maharashtra, The Commissioner, Amravati Municipal Corporation, Sagar Ukarda Athor (Athawale)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of Municipal Corporation refusing compassionate appointment to petitioner on ground of marriage.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of order dated 18-09-2012 and direction for her compassionate appointment.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was declared ineligible for compassionate appointment because she got married.

Previous Decisions

Municipal Corporation passed order on 18-09-2012 appointing respondent no.3 and rejecting petitioner's claim.

Issues

Whether marriage of a daughter disqualifies her from compassionate appointment under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that there is no bar in the scheme for compassionate appointment that a married daughter is ineligible. Respondents contended that the petitioner got married and hence is not entitled to compassionate appointment.

Ratio Decidendi

The scheme for compassionate appointment under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 does not contain any provision disqualifying a married daughter. Therefore, marriage cannot be a ground to deny compassionate appointment.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition is directed against the order dated 18092012 passed by respondent no.2 Municipal Corporation appointing respondent no.3 and declaring petitioner ineligible for the compassionate appointment as she got married. The court held that the scheme for compassionate appointment does not contain any provision disqualifying a married daughter.

Procedural History

Petitioner applied for compassionate appointment on 19-03-1998. Respondent no.3 applied on 25-05-2009. Petitioner objected on 19-04-2012. Impugned order passed on 18-09-2012. Writ petition filed on 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Teachers' Petitions for Revised Pay Scales in Aided Schools. Teachers in Private Aided Schools Entitled to Same Pay Scales as Government Employees Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sales by Karta Not Binding on Coparceners. Hindu Law Requires Legal Necessity for Alienation of Joint Family Property; Burden on Alienee Not Discharged.