High Court of Bombay at Goa Alters Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Single Blow Case — Lack of Intention to Kill Established. Single Blow Inflicted During Sudden Quarrel Without Premeditation Falls Under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, Reducing Offence to Section 304 Part II IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 203
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Ulhas Kauthankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for the offence of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment. The incident involved a single blow inflicted with a knife on the deceased during a sudden quarrel. The appellant appealed to the High Court of Bombay at Goa, arguing that the conviction should be altered to one under Section 304 Part II IPC as there was no intention to commit murder. The State opposed the appeal, submitting that the conviction was correct. The High Court examined the material on record and found that the incident occurred during a sudden fight without premeditation, and the appellant had no intention to cause death. The court relied on Division Bench judgments in Subhash Samal Vs. State of Goa and Suresh Behra Vs. State, which held that a single blow in a sudden quarrel without intention to kill falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, making it culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Consequently, the court altered the conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part II IPC. Considering that the appellant had already undergone about 2 years and 6 months of imprisonment, the court sentenced him to the period already undergone and directed his release unless required in another case.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Culpable Homicide - Murder - Section 302, 304 Part II, 300 Exception 4 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Single Blow - Sudden Fight - The appellant inflicted a single blow with a knife on the deceased during a sudden quarrel without premeditation. The court held that the absence of intention to cause death and the presence of a sudden fight brought the case within Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, reducing the offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC. (Paras 2-5)

B) Criminal Law - Sentencing - Section 304 Part II Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The court, after altering the conviction, sentenced the appellant to the period already undergone (approximately 2 years and 6 months) and directed his release unless required in another case. (Para 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder was sustainable or whether the offence fell under Section 304 Part II IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) given the absence of intention to cause death.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the appeal in part, altered the conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part II IPC, and sentenced the appellant to the period already undergone (about 2 years and 6 months). The appellant was directed to be released unless required in another case.

Law Points

  • Culpable homicide not amounting to murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • intention to cause death
  • knowledge of likely death
  • single blow
  • sudden fight
  • exception 4 to Section 300 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (06) 150

Criminal Appeal No. 45 of 2014

2016-06-09

F. M. Reis, Nutan D. Sardessai

2016:BHC-GOA:1263-DB

Mr. G. Teles (for appellant), Shri S. R. Rivankar (Public Prosecutor for respondent)

Shri Ulhas Kauthankar

State (through Bicholim Police Station)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought alteration of conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part II IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge convicting him under Section 302 IPC.

Previous Decisions

Additional Sessions Judge convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder was sustainable or whether the offence fell under Section 304 Part II IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that there was no intention to commit murder and the conviction should be altered to Section 304 Part II IPC. State argued that the conviction under Section 302 IPC was correct and should be upheld.

Ratio Decidendi

A single blow inflicted during a sudden quarrel without premeditation and without intention to cause death falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, reducing the offence from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The question which arises for consideration in the backdrop of the material on record is whether the learned Additional Sessions Judge had properly appreciated the material on record to hold that the offence of culpable homicide amounting to murder had been committed by the appellant and or whether it was a fit case in the ... the conviction had to be altered to that under Section 304(ii) IPC as no intention to commit the offence of murder was proved against him.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay at Goa. The High Court heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 9 June 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 304 Part II, 300 Exception 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of PwD-OBC Candidate for MBBS Admission Despite Inadvertent Error in NEET Application Form. Court Directs Admission Based on Disability Certificate and Provisional Selection Letter, Emphasizing Substantive Rights Ove...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Reviews Legality of Orders Denying Entry Tax Concession on Imported Motor Vehicles Under EPCG Scheme. Court Considers Whether Item 9 of Exemption Notification Dated 19.05.2003 Under Section 25(1) of Goa Tax on Entry of Goo...