Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Truck Driver Established by FIR and Police Papers. No Evidence of Contributory Negligence by Jeep Driver Adduced, Hence Tribunal's Award of Rs.9,12,000/- Upheld.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 89
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a fatal motor accident that occurred on 20 July 2007. The deceased, Raman Ghatule, along with others, was returning to his village in a jeep after attending a religious event. At around 4:35 am, the jeep collided with a car container truck coming from the opposite direction on the Pune-Solapur road. The jeep was tossed into a ditch, and Raman Ghatule sustained fatal injuries, dying shortly after the accident. An FIR was registered against the driver of the truck. The widow and two sons of the deceased (Respondent Nos. 1-3) filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Solapur, seeking compensation. The Tribunal partly allowed the claim, awarding Rs.9,12,000/- jointly and severally against the owner of the truck (Respondent No. 4) and the insurer (Appellant - United India Insurance Co. Ltd.). The Insurance Company appealed, primarily arguing that the accident occurred due to the negligence of the jeep driver, and therefore there was contributory negligence. The claimants supported the Tribunal's order. The High Court examined the evidence, noting that the FIR and police papers clearly indicated that the truck driver was solely responsible for the accident. The Court observed that the appellant had not adduced any evidence to prove contributory negligence. The Tribunal's finding on negligence was based on the available material and was not perverse. Regarding quantum, the Court found no error in the calculation of compensation. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal's award was upheld.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Negligence - Burden of Proof - The Insurance Company appealed against the award of compensation, contending contributory negligence by the jeep driver. The Court held that the FIR and police papers indicated the truck driver was solely responsible. The appellant failed to adduce any evidence to prove contributory negligence. The Tribunal's finding of negligence was based on available material and not perverse. (Paras 5-7)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Quantum - The Tribunal awarded Rs.9,12,000/- to the claimants (widow and sons) for the death of Raman Ghatule in a road accident. The Court found no error in the calculation of compensation based on the deceased's income and multiplier. (Paras 8-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal erred in holding the truck driver solely negligent and awarding compensation without considering contributory negligence of the jeep driver.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The First Appeal is dismissed. The judgment and order dated 09/01/2013 passed by the learned Additional Ex-Officio Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Solapur is confirmed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Negligence
  • Contributory Negligence
  • Burden of Proof
  • Compensation Calculation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (06) 88

First Appeal No.1309 of 2013

2016-06-09

R. M. Savant, J.

Ms. Pooja Joshi i/by Mr. A A Joshi for the Appellant, Mr. R S Alange for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3

The Divisional Office, The United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Smt. Pramila Raman Ghatule, Nagesh Raman Ghatule, Vivek Raman Ghatule, M/s. Kargo Wings (Madras) Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First Appeal against judgment and order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarding compensation to claimants.

Remedy Sought

The appellant (Insurance Company) sought to set aside the Tribunal's award on the ground of contributory negligence.

Filing Reason

The appellant contended that the accident occurred due to negligence of the jeep driver, and the Tribunal erred in holding the truck driver solely negligent.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Solapur, partly allowed the claim petition and awarded Rs.9,12,000/- jointly and severally against the appellant and respondent No.4.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in holding the truck driver solely negligent without considering contributory negligence of the jeep driver? Whether the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company): The accident occurred due to negligence of the jeep driver; there was contributory negligence; the Tribunal erred in not considering the same. Respondent Nos.1-3 (Claimants): The Tribunal correctly held the truck driver negligent based on FIR and police papers; no evidence of contributory negligence was adduced by the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi

In a motor accident claim, the burden of proving contributory negligence lies on the party alleging it. The FIR and police papers are relevant to determine negligence. If the appellant fails to adduce evidence to prove contributory negligence, the Tribunal's finding based on available material cannot be disturbed unless perverse.

Judgment Excerpts

The FIR and the police papers clearly indicate that the accident occurred on account of the negligence of the driver of the car container truck. The appellant has not adduced any evidence to prove that there was any contributory negligence on the part of the driver of the jeep. The finding of the Tribunal on the issue of negligence cannot be said to be perverse.

Procedural History

The claimants filed Motor Accident Claim Petition No.101 of 2009 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Solapur. The Tribunal partly allowed the claim on 09/01/2013. The Insurance Company filed First Appeal No.1309 of 2013 before the Bombay High Court, which was dismissed on 09/06/2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Truck Driver Established by FIR and Police Papers. No Evidence of Contributory Negligence by Jeep Driver Adduced, Hence Tribunal's Award of Rs.9,12,000/-...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Illegal Retrenchment. Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Void, and Full Back Wages A...