Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Petition by Masjid Committee Challenging Wakf Tribunal Order. Property Already Registered as Trust Under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 is Deemed Wakf Under Section 43 of Wakf Act, 1995.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 70
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present civil revision application was filed by the managing committee of Khatik Masjid Shaniwar Peth, Satara (the petitioners) challenging the judgment and order of the Wakf Tribunal in Wakf Appeal No.2 of 2008. The Wakf Tribunal had dismissed the appeal filed by the respondents (Smt. Salimabi Shamsher Shaikh and others, and the Maharashtra Wakf Board) against an order of the Wakf Board made under Section 40 of the Wakf Act, 1995. The Wakf Board, after an inquiry, had ordered that property bearing C.T.S. No.132 situated at Satara city be registered as Wakf property belonging to the Masjid. The petitioners had earlier filed two applications before the Wakf Board under Sections 36 and 40 of the Act. The first application for registration of the Wakf was disposed of by the Chief Officer on the ground that the Wakf was already registered in 1970 as a trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, and by virtue of Section 43 of the Wakf Act, 1995, there was a deemed registration. The second application under Section 40 led to the inquiry and the order declaring the property as Wakf. The respondents appealed to the Wakf Tribunal, which dismissed the appeal. The High Court, after hearing both sides, found no merit in the revision petition. The court held that since the property was already registered as a trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, it is deemed to be registered as Wakf under Section 43 of the Wakf Act, 1995. The court also noted that the Wakf Tribunal had correctly appreciated the facts and law. Accordingly, the civil revision application was dismissed, and the order of the Wakf Tribunal was upheld.

Headnote

A) Wakf Property - Deemed Registration - Section 43 of Wakf Act, 1995 - Property already registered as a trust under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 is deemed to be registered as Wakf under Section 43 of the Wakf Act, 1995 - The Wakf Board's order under Section 40 of the Act declaring the property as Wakf was upheld by the Wakf Tribunal - The High Court found no error in the Tribunal's decision and dismissed the revision petition (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the property bearing C.T.S. No.132 situated at Satara city is a Wakf property and whether the Wakf Board's order under Section 40 of the Wakf Act, 1995 declaring it as such is valid, and whether the Wakf Tribunal's dismissal of the appeal against that order is correct.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The civil revision application is dismissed. The order of the Wakf Tribunal in Wakf Appeal No.2 of 2008 is upheld.

Law Points

  • Deemed registration under Section 43 of Wakf Act
  • 1995
  • Section 36 and 40 of Wakf Act
  • Bombay Public Trust Act
  • 1950
  • Wakf Tribunal jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (12) 1

Civil Revision Application No. 10 of 2014

2015-12-09

T. V. Nalawade, J.

Mr. V. D. Sapkal for Petitioners, Mr. A. K. Gawali for Respondent No.1

The Khatik Masjid Wakf/ Trust through its Mutwallis (9 individuals)

Smt. Salimabi Shamsher Shaikh and others, The Maharashtra Wakf Board

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil revision application challenging the judgment and order of the Wakf Tribunal in Wakf Appeal No.2 of 2008.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought to set aside the Wakf Tribunal's order which upheld the Wakf Board's order declaring property C.T.S. No.132 as Wakf property.

Filing Reason

The petitioners, managing committee of Khatik Masjid, challenged the Wakf Tribunal's dismissal of the appeal against the Wakf Board's order under Section 40 of the Wakf Act, 1995.

Previous Decisions

The Wakf Board, after an inquiry under Section 40, ordered registration of the property as Wakf. The Wakf Tribunal dismissed the appeal against that order.

Issues

Whether the property C.T.S. No.132 is Wakf property. Whether the Wakf Board's order under Section 40 of the Wakf Act, 1995 was valid. Whether the Wakf Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the property was already registered as a trust under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 and thus deemed registered as Wakf under Section 43 of the Wakf Act, 1995. Respondents supported the Wakf Board's order declaring the property as Wakf.

Ratio Decidendi

A property already registered as a trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 is deemed to be registered as Wakf under Section 43 of the Wakf Act, 1995. The Wakf Tribunal correctly appreciated the facts and law, and no interference is warranted.

Judgment Excerpts

It appears that the present petitioners, the managing committee of Khatik Masjid Shaniwar Peth, Satara had filed two applications before Wakf Board and they were under section 36 and 40 of the Act. The first application was disposed of by the Chief Officer by observing that the Wakf was already registered in the year 1970 as a trust under Bombay Public Trust Act as the said Act was applicable in that area and in view of provision of section 43 of the Act there was a deemed registration in favour of the Wakf.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed applications under Sections 36 and 40 of the Wakf Act, 1995 before the Wakf Board. The first application was disposed of noting deemed registration under Section 43. The second application led to an inquiry under Section 40, and the Wakf Board ordered registration of the property as Wakf. The respondents appealed to the Wakf Tribunal, which dismissed the appeal. The petitioners then filed the present civil revision application in the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Wakf Act, 1995: 36, 40, 43
  • Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition in Property Dispute - Adverse Possession Claim Fails. Petitioner failed to prove continuous possession for 12 years under Limitation Act, 1963.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Suspended Director in IL&FS Accounts Reopening Case — Recasting Permitted Under Section 130 Companies Act. Court holds that SFIO and ICAI reports provide sufficient basis for reopening accounts and that suspended d...