Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Revision Seeking Cancellation of Wife's Maintenance — Temporary Employment Not Sufficient Ground Under Section 127 CrPC. The court held that temporary nature of wife's job does not amount to change in circumstances to cancel maintenance under Section 127 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 85
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a criminal revision filed by Prashant Manikrao Bagade (applicant/husband) against the judgment and order dated 22.10.2010 passed by the Family Court, Akola, in E.R. Petition No. 414 of 2009. The husband had filed an application under Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking cancellation of maintenance granted to his wife (non-applicant no. 1) and minor son (non-applicant no. 2). The background is that the wife and son had earlier filed a maintenance application under Section 125 CrPC (M.C.C. No. 1096/05), which was allowed by the Magistrate on 12.12.2006 granting Rs.1000/- per month to the wife and Rs.800/- per month to the son. The husband's revision against that order was dismissed on 01.10.2007, and the wife's revision was allowed, enhancing maintenance to Rs.1500/- each per month. The husband did not challenge the dismissal of his revision, so the maintenance order attained finality. In 2009, the husband filed an application under Section 127 CrPC for cancellation of maintenance, claiming that the wife had obtained a temporary job at ITI College, Amravati, from 07.02.2009, and was earning a substantial salary sufficient for her maintenance. The Family Court dismissed the application. In the High Court, the husband's counsel submitted that the husband was giving up his claim regarding the son and pressing only against the wife. The High Court observed that the wife's job was purely temporary and could cease at any time. The Family Court had correctly considered this aspect. The High Court held that temporary employment does not constitute a change in circumstances warranting cancellation of maintenance under Section 127 CrPC. The revision was dismissed, and the order of the Family Court was confirmed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Maintenance - Cancellation under Section 127 - Temporary Employment - The husband sought cancellation of maintenance awarded to wife on ground that she obtained temporary employment. The Family Court dismissed the application. The High Court held that temporary employment, which can cease at any time, does not constitute a sufficient change in circumstances to cancel maintenance under Section 127 CrPC. The revision was dismissed. (Paras 9-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the wife obtaining temporary employment constitutes a change in circumstances sufficient to cancel maintenance under Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the criminal revision, confirming the Family Court's order dated 22.10.2010 dismissing the application under Section 127 CrPC.

Law Points

  • Section 127 CrPC
  • cancellation of maintenance
  • temporary employment
  • change in circumstances
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (08) 153

Criminal Revision No. 202 of 2010

2015-08-25

V.M. Deshpande, J.

Mr. S.V. Sirpurkar for the Applicant, Mr. Biyani h/f Mr. M.G. Sarda for the Non-applicants

Prashant Manikrao Bagade

Sau. Kanchan Prashant Bagade @ Kancha Deomanrao Hatalkar and Shriyash s/o Prashant Bagade

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal revision against Family Court order dismissing application under Section 127 CrPC for cancellation of maintenance.

Remedy Sought

The applicant/husband sought cancellation of maintenance granted to his wife and son under Section 125 CrPC.

Filing Reason

The husband claimed that the wife obtained temporary employment and was earning sufficient salary for her maintenance.

Previous Decisions

Maintenance was granted by Magistrate on 12.12.2006; husband's revision dismissed on 01.10.2007; wife's revision allowed enhancing maintenance to Rs.1500/- each per month; husband did not challenge dismissal, so order attained finality.

Issues

Whether temporary employment of wife constitutes a change in circumstances under Section 127 CrPC to cancel maintenance.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant/husband argued that wife got a temporary job and earns substantial salary, so maintenance should be cancelled. Non-applicants/wife and son opposed, and husband gave up claim regarding son, pressing only against wife.

Ratio Decidendi

Temporary employment, which can cease at any time, does not constitute a sufficient change in circumstances to cancel maintenance under Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Judgment Excerpts

The nature of service is purely temporary and at any point of time her services can be ceased to exist. The said aspect, in my view, is correctly considered by the learned Judge of the Family Court while dismissing the application under Section 127 Cr.P.C.

Procedural History

Maintenance application under Section 125 CrPC (M.C.C. No. 1096/05) allowed on 12.12.2006. Husband's revision (Cri. Revi. No. 12/07) dismissed on 01.10.2007; wife's revision (Cri. Revi. No. 2/07) allowed enhancing maintenance. Husband filed application under Section 127 CrPC in 2009, transferred to Family Court as E.R. Petition No. 414/09, dismissed on 22.10.2010. Present revision filed in 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 125, 127
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Teacher's Petition for Surplus Teacher Benefits Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner failed to challenge DEO order for 11 years and did not comply with earlier court directions.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused. The court found that the prosecution established motive and last seen evidence against accused No....