WRIT PETITION NO. 4457 OF 2015

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioners, various unaided schools including minority schools, filed writ petitions before the High Court of Bombay challenging Government Resolutions dated 23 July 2015 and 21 January 2015, and a Circular dated 13 April 2015, issued by the State of Maharashtra and its education authorities. These resolutions and circulars pertained to admissions under the 25% quota for disadvantaged groups and weaker sections as mandated by Section 12(1)(c) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The Petitioners sought quashing of these instruments, arguing they were illegal, vague, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, and that they contravened the statutory requirement that only children from the neighbourhood meeting all three conditions (weaker section, disadvantaged group, neighbourhood) be recommended for admission. They also sought a direction to constitute the State Advisory Council under Section 34 of the Act. The State and other respondents opposed the petitions. Multiple connected writ petitions and public interest litigations were heard together by a Division Bench of Justices Anoop V. Mohta and V. L. Achliya. The court heard arguments and reserved judgment on 6 August 2015, pronouncing it on 14 August 2015. The full text of the judgment, including the court's findings and order, is not available in the provided excerpt.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Government Resolutions dated 23 July 2015 and 21 January 2015 and the Circular dated 13 April 2015 are valid and compliant with Section 12(1)(c) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, particularly regarding the conditions of belonging to weaker section, disadvantaged group, and neighbourhood; and whether the State Advisory Council under Section 34 of the Act should be constituted before issuing such resolutions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (08) 109

Writ Petition No. 4457 of 2015 with connected petitions

2015-08-14

Anoop V Mohta, V L Achliya

Mr. A.V. Anturkar, Mr. S.B. Deshmukh, Mr. Prathamesh Bhargude, Mr. K.S. Bapat, Mr. Mihir Desai, Mr. Chetan Mali, Mr. R.A. Rodrigues, Mr. N.V. Masurkar, Mr. S.G. Thakur, Mr. D.R. More, Mr. Prashant Kamble, Mr. Vishwanath Patil, Mr. Nitin Deshpande, Ms. S.S. Bhende, Dr. Birendra Saraf, Mr. Piyush Raheja, Mr. Vishesh Malviya, Ms. Nikita Mishra, Ms. Anjali Helekar, Mr. Y.S. Bhate, Mr. Dushyant Kumar, Ms. Avisha Kulkarni, Ms. Neeta Masurkar, Mr. H.S. Venegaonkar, Mr. Anurag Gokhale, Mr. Rahul Deodhar, Mr. J.S. Saluja, Mrs. Surekha Sonawane, Mr. Rajdeep Suresh Khadapkar

Dr. Vikhe Patil Foundation's Vikhe Patil Memorial School, Pune & Ors. (and connected petitioners)

Union of India, State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging Government Resolutions and circulars regarding admissions under Section 12(1)(c) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of Government Resolutions dated 23 July 2015 and 21 January 2015 and Circular dated 13 April 2015; direction to recommend only children belonging to weaker section, disadvantaged group, and neighbourhood; constitution of State Advisory Council under Section 34 of the Act.

Filing Reason

Unaided schools alleged that the resolutions and circulars were illegal, vague, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, and not in conformity with the RTE Act requirements.

Issues

Validity of Government Resolution dated 21 January 2015 and 23 July 2015 Validity of Circular dated 13 April 2015 Compliance with Section 12(1)(c) RTE Act regarding weaker section, disadvantaged group, and neighbourhood Necessity of State Advisory Council under Section 34 before issuing resolutions

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioners are imparting “preprimary and elementary education” in their respective unaided “schools”. Some are unaided minority schools also. That this Honourable Court be pleased to issue a writ mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction and order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, directing the Respondents herein to recommend the names under the Provision of the Right of Children to the Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 to the Petitioners schools under the Provision of Section 12 [1] [c] of the Act. Only of those students who comply with all the three conditions mentioned in section 12 [1] [c] viz. [a] That the child must belong to the weaker section within the meaning of section 2 [c] of the Act, And [b] That the child must belong to the disadvantaged group within the meaning of section 2[d] of the Act, and [c] The child must be from the neighborhood. The similar challenge appeare except certain more raised in other Writ Petitions also. Both the Public Interest Litigations are based only for supporting the State action.

Procedural History

Writ Petition No. 4457 of 2015 filed on 15 April 2015; heard along with connected matters; arguments closed on 6 August 2015; judgment pronounced on 14 August 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009: Section 2(a), 2(d), 2(e), 2(f), 2(h), 2(n), 12(1)(c), 34
  • The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXVII, Rule 4
  • The Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 14, Article 162
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court WRIT PETITION NO. 4457 OF 2015
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Mother's Appeal in Maintenance Case: DNA Test Cannot Rebut Presumption of Legitimacy Under Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The Court held that a child born during a valid marriage is entitled to maintenance from the leg...